Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38103142›Full record

ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2024

Planning abilities of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes troglodytes) in tool-using contexts.

Stephanie Musgrave, David Koni, David Morgan, Crickette Sanz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Forms and Structures of Chimpanzee Algae Fishing.American journal of primatology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A short natural history of mental time travels: a journey still travelled?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. The function of episodic memory in animals.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephanie MusgraveDepartment of Anthropology, University of Miami, P.O. Box 248106, Coral Gables, FL, 33124-2005, USA. smusgrave@miami.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5543-0898
David KoniWildlife Conservation Society, Congo Program, B.P. 14537, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo.
David MorganFisher Center for the Study and Conservation of Apes, Lincoln Park Zoo, 2001 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL, 60614, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1266-2610
Crickette SanzWildlife Conservation Society, Congo Program, B.P. 14537, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2018-2721
Lincoln Park Zoo · USUniversity of Miami · USWashington University in St. Louis · USWildlife Conservation Society Congo · CG

Funding

National Science Foundation 1613596Wenner-Gren Foundation 9201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Planning is a type of problem solving in which a course of future action is devised via mental computation. Potential advantages of planning for tool use include reduced effort to gather tools, closer alignment to an efficient tool design, and increased foraging efficiency. Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes troglodytes) in the Goualougo Triangle use a variety of different types of tools. We hypothesized that procurement strategy (brought to the termite nest, manufactured or acquired at the termite nest, or borrowed from others) reflects planning for current needs, with tool transport behavior varying by tool type and by age and sex class. It is also possible that chimpanzees anticipate the need for tools at future times, which would be evidenced by transporting multiple tool types for a sequential task. One year of video recordings at termite nests were systematically screened for tool procurement; data comprised 299 tool procurement events across 66 chimpanzees. In addition, we screened video recordings of leaf sponging and honey gathering, which resulted in another 38 procurement events. Fishing probes, which are typically used during a single visit, were typically transported to termite nests, while puncturing tools, which are durable and remain on site, were more often acquired at termite nests. Most tools transported in multiples were fishing probes, perhaps in anticipation that a single probe might not last through an entire foraging bout or might be transferred to another chimpanzee. We further documented that chimpanzees transported tool sets, comprising multiple different tool types used in sequence. Mature chimpanzees transported tools more often than did immatures. These observations suggest that chimpanzees plan tool use flexibly, reflecting the availability of raw materials and the likelihood that specific tool types will be needed for particular tasks. Developmental studies and further integration of behavioral, spatial, and archaeological data will help to illuminate the decision making and time depth of planning associated with tool technologies in living primates and hominin ancestors.

Indexed as

Pan troglodytesTool Use BehaviorAnimalsFemaleMaleProblem SolvingVideo RecordingCognitionTermite fishTool manufactureTool setTool use

Identifiers

PMID38103142
PMCPMC11561005
OpenAlexW4389828785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.