Trial reportNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2024
Population pharmacokinetic modeling of levodropropizine: extended application to comparative analysis between commercial formulations and exploration of pharmacokinetic effects of diet.
Trial report in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacokinetic Prediction of Immediate- and Extended-Release Tablets for Patients with Liver Disease Using Whole Body Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling for the Antipsychotic Drug Quetiapine.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2024Article
- Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Levodropropizine and Its Potential Therapeutic Advantages Considering Eosinophil Levels and Clinical Indications.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Levodropropizine, a nonopioid antitussive agent, is being increasingly used in clinical practice with the development of several formulations for symptomatic relief of acute and chronic bronchitis. However, scientific and quantitative population pharmacokinetic analyses of levodropropizine are lacking. Moreover, no integrated quantitative comparison has been performed between formulations. This study quantitatively evaluated and predicted pharmacokinetic properties of formulations through population pharmacokinetic model-based comparisons of commercially available formulations. Plasma concentration profile results from bioequivalence studies of 60-mg immediate release (IR) levodropropizine tablets in 40 healthy Korean males were used as population pharmacokinetic modeling data. For interindividual variability in levodropropizine pharmacokinetics, body surface area was identified as an effective covariate that was positively correlated with peripheral compartment distribution volume. Population pharmacokinetic model for IR tablets well-described the levodropropizine syrup and capsule datasets, suggesting no significant differences in pharmacokinetics among IR tablets, syrups, and capsules of levodropropizine. In contrast, pharmacokinetic profiles differed between 90-mg controlled release (CR) and IR levodropropizine tablets; however, separate parameter estimation was possible by applying the same model structure. In terms of pharmacokinetics, twice-daily regimen of 90-mg CR tablets was equivalent to thrice-daily regimen of 60-mg IR tablets. However, at steady-state, interindividual plasma concentration variability within population was reduced by approximately 36.71-83.18%. For levodropropizine CR tablets, a high-fat diet significantly delayed gastrointestinal absorption but maintained overall plasma exposure equivalent. This study provides useful quantitative judgment data for precision medicine of levodropropizine and can be helpful in predicting the pharmacokinetics of levodropropizine based on commercialized formulation switching.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.