Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38103018›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2024

Preliminary validation of the Cognitive Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised in cancer populations.

Stella Snyder, Ekin Secinti, Kelly Chinh, Wei Wu, Shelley A Johns, Catherine E Mosher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stella SnyderDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Ekin SecintiDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Kelly ChinhSeattle Division, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2263-7083
Wei WuDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Shelley A JohnsDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Catherine E MosherDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Funding

Interdisciplinary Training in Cancer Prevention and ControlT32CA117865 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Victoria Lee Champion, Catherine E Mosher · 2016 to 2026
$2.4M
Telephone Symptom Management for Advanced Lung Cancer Patients and CaregiversK07CA168883 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOSHER, CATHERINE E · 2013 to 2017
$682k
Research and Training for Behavioral Oncology InterventionsK05CA175048 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHAMPION, VICTORIA LEE · 2014 to 2018
$484k
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA175048NCI NIH HHS K05CA175048NCI NIH HHS K07 CA168883NCI NIH HHS K07CA168883NCI NIH HHS T32 CA117865NCI NIH HHS T32CA117865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA brief, valid, and comprehensive measure of mindfulness is needed for cancer populations. This study examined the factor structure, internal consistency, construct validity, and measurement invariance of the 10-item Cognitive Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R) in patients with cancer.

methodsPatients with breast, gastrointestinal, lung, or prostate cancer (N = 404, 50% stage IV cancer, 51% women) were recruited from academic and public clinics in Indianapolis, IN. Patients completed the CAMS-R and other psychological measures at one time point. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to examine the dimensionality of the CAMS-R. Internal consistency and construct validity were also assessed. Measurement invariance was examined for gender, cancer type, and cancer stage.

resultsCFA showed that the original CAMS-R structure with four first-order factors (attention, present focus, awareness, and acceptance) and one second-order factor (mindfulness) had a reasonable fit (RMSEA = 0.09, CFI = 0.95, SRMR = 0.04). Internal consistency was excellent (α = 0.90). The CAMS-R total score showed significant positive associations with several subscales of a widely used mindfulness questionnaire and self-compassion (rs = 0.61-0.66) and significant negative associations with anxiety, depressive symptoms, rumination, psychological inflexibility, and avoidant coping (rs = -0.35-0.58). Measurement invariance testing indicated that the CAMS-R was invariant across populations of varying genders, cancer types, and stages.

conclusionsFindings provide preliminary support for using the CAMS-R in cancer populations. Future research should assess the responsiveness of the CAMS-R to intervention.

Indexed as

MindfulnessNeoplasmsCognitionFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairescancerinvariance testingmeasurementmindfulnessoncologypsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID38103018
PMCPMC10923603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.