Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38102765›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2024

Estimating the potential impact of a health tax on the demand for unhealthy food and beverages and on tax revenue in India.

Beena Varghese, Rajashree Panicker, Dripto Mukhopadhyay, Kathryn Backholer, Vani Sethi, Arjan de Wagt, Zivai Murira, Neena Bhatia, Monika Arora

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Beena VargheseIndian Institute of Public Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Kismatpur, Hyderabad, Telangana 500030, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4329-2811
Rajashree PanickerTotal Alliance Health Partners International, Dubai Healthcare City, Dubai 66566, UAE.
Dripto MukhopadhyayAscension Centre for Research and Analytics (ACRA), 5/1, Sector 5, Rajendra Nagar, Sahibabad, Ghaziabad, UP 201005, India.
Kathryn BackholerA/P Deakin University, Geelong, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia.
Vani SethiUNICEF Regional Office for South Asia, Kathmandu 5815, Nepal.
Arjan de WagtUNICEF, New Delhi 110003, India.
Zivai MuriraUNICEF Regional Office for South Asia, Kathmandu 5815, Nepal.
Neena BhatiaMinistry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi 110011, India.
Monika AroraPublic Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, Haryana 122102, India.
Deakin University · AUGovernment of India · INInstitute of Management Technology · INInstitute of Public Health Bengaluru · INPublic Health Foundation of India · INTotal (France) · FRUnited Nations Children's Fund India · IN

Funding

UNICEFUNICEF India Country Office, New Delhi
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foods high in fat, sugar or salt are important contributors to the rising burden of non-communicable diseases globally and in India. Health taxes (HTs) have been used by over 70 countries as an effective tool for reducing consumption of sugar sweetened beverages (SSBs). However, the potential impacts of HTs on consumption and on revenues have not been estimated in India. This paper aims to estimate the potential impact of health taxes on the demand for sugar, SSBs and foods high in fat, sugar or salt (HFSS) in India while exploring its impact on tax revenues. PE of sugar was estimated using Private Final Consumption Expenditure and Consumer Price Index data while price elasticities for SSBs and HFSS were obtained from literature. The reduction in demand was estimated for an additional 10-30% HT added to the current goods and services tax, for varying levels of price elasticities. The results show that for manufacturers of sweets and confectionaries who buy sugar in bulk and assuming a higher price elasticity of -0.70, 20% additional HT (total tax 48%) would result in 13-18% decrease in the demand for sugar used for confectionaries and sweets. For SSBs, HT of 10-30% would result in 7-30% decline in the demand of SSBs. For HFSS food products, 10-30% HT would result in 5-24% decline in the demand for HFSS products. These additional taxes would increase tax revenues for the government by 12-200% across different scenarios. Taxing unhealthy foods is likely to reduce demand, while increasing government revenues for reinvestment back into public health programmes and policies that may reduce obesity and the incidence of non-communicable diseases in India.

Indexed as

Noncommunicable DiseasesBeveragesCommerceHumansIndiaSugarsTaxesSugarsIndiaNCDsprice elasticitysugarTaxationunhealthy foods

Identifiers

PMID38102765
PMCPMC11423843
OpenAlexW4389827304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.