Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38102673›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2023

Healthy working in inclusive companies - a study protocol of the GAIN project.

Fabian Holzgreve, Bettina Bredereck, Christopher Heim, Britta Weber, Rolf Ellegast, David A Groneberg, Christian Gaum, Daniela Ohlendorf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Principles of occupational medicine: an educational case study of hazards and risks for Dr "Indiana" Jones.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fabian HolzgreveInstitute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9a, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. holzgreve@med.uni-frankfurt.de.
Bettina BredereckDepartment of Psychology and Sports Sciences, Institute of Sport Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Christopher HeimDepartment of Psychology and Sports Sciences, Institute of Sport Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Britta WeberInstitute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurance (IFA), Sankt Augustin, Germany.
Rolf EllegastInstitute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurance (IFA), Sankt Augustin, Germany.
David A GronebergInstitute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9a, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Christian Gaum *Faculty of Sports Sciences, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Daniela Ohlendorf *Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9a, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEInstitut für Arbeitsschutz der Deutschen Gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung · DERuhr University Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe research project GAIN (working healthy in inclusion companies) deals with the topics of health and work in inclusive companies. Due to a great need for research on (occupational) health (e.g. physical and mental health status) and workplace design in companies employing people with disabilities, this project pursues the primary goal of generating information for the development and implementation of health-preserving measures within the framework of occupational health and safety, and risk assessment, for employees with and without impairments in inclusive companies.

methodsWithin the framework of the project, the employees of three inclusive companies will be examined with the help of an interdisciplinary and triangulative approach. Using quantitative and qualitative methods, specific physical workloads and hazards will be investigated by means of baseline screening methods and measurement techniques, specifically among employees with physical disabilities and impairments. In the statistical analysis, descriptive methods will be used to record the current state, while inferential statistical methods will be used to evaluate health maintenance measures. Inferential statistics for continuous data with confidence intervals based on the statistical parametric mapping (SPM) method will also be performed. The significance level will be set at 5%. Qualitative methods will be used to analyse structures and working conditions within the companies, with particular attention to the specific construction of the relationship between work, health and disability.

conclusionsThe structures in inclusion companies must be specifically designed to support and promote the understanding of work and health in relation to the idea of one's own body, its positioning in space and its performance. These characteristics are to be identified in the course of the project and bundled into best-practice recommendations. Furthermore, it is the aim of the research project to derive recommendations for action at its conclusion and to present further advice for the promotion of health in inclusive companies.

Indexed as

Ergonomic risk assessmentInertial motion captureInertial motion unitsPeople with disabilitiesSocial firmsWorkloadsWorkplace designWorkplace health promotion

Identifiers

PMID38102673
PMCPMC10725018
OpenAlexW4389784720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.