Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38102626›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2023

Pulmonary function assessment after COVID-19 in vaccinated healthcare workers.

Lorenzo Ippoliti, Luca Coppeta, Giuseppina Somma, Giuseppe Bizzarro, Francesco Borelli, Teresa Crispino, Cristiana Ferrari, Ilaria Iannuzzi, Andrea Mazza, Agostino Paolino and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lorenzo IppolitiDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, 00133, Italy. ippoliti.lo@libero.it.
Luca CoppetaDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, 00133, Italy.
Giuseppina SommaDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, 00133, Italy.
Giuseppe BizzarroDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, 00133, Italy.
Francesco BorelliDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, 00133, Italy.
Teresa CrispinoDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, 00133, Italy.
Cristiana FerrariDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, 00133, Italy.
Ilaria IannuzziDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, 00133, Italy.
Andrea MazzaDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, 00133, Italy.
Agostino PaolinoDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, 00133, Italy.
Andrea MagriniDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, 00133, Italy.
Antonio PietroiustiSaint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Rome, 00131, Italy.
University of Rome Tor Vergata · ITSaint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 typically presents with flu-like symptoms due to the viral infection itself. The most severe cases are characterised by lung damage, an important factor in fatal outcome due to alveolar damage. In some cases, patients develop a long COVID with persistent symptoms of chest pain and fatigue. Causes, including organ damage or inflammation, are being investigated. Clinical outcomes are variable and permanent lung damage is not fully understood, while vaccination is effective against severe infection but its effect on respiratory function in mild cases remains uncertain. This retrospective study aims to analyse changes in lung function in HCWs who had COVID-19 between 2020 and 2022, comparing their spirometric test results before and after the pandemic and taking into account their vaccination status. 321 HCWs were included in the study. The study examined spirometric parameters both before and after the pandemic, and all measured outcomes except the FEV1/FVC ratio showed a significant decrease during the study period. We then assessed the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and changes in lung function parameters, analysing infections in 2020, 2021 and 2022 separately. We found a statistically significant difference in Forced vital capacity (FVC) between infected and non-infected subjects in 2020 and 2021, but not in 2022. To evaluate the protective effect of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on respiratory function, a linear regression analysis was performed using changes in FVC, Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FVC/FEV1 ratio and Peak expiratory flow (PEF) as dependent variables. The analysis showed that the decline in FVC was significantly lower in subjects who had been vaccinated prior to infection. The study concludes that subclinical SARS-CoV-2 infections in 2020 and 2021 worsened respiratory parameters (FVC and FEV1), but vaccination protected against these effects. Even healthy individuals with previous infections showed respiratory changes, with vaccination providing protection, especially for FVC decline. This highlights the importance of vaccinating healthcare workers against COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19Healthcare workersRespiratory functionSARS-CoV-2SpirometryVaccination

Identifiers

PMID38102626
PMCPMC10724929
OpenAlexW4389794814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.