Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38102619›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Cross-sectional Survey of Medical student perceptions of And desires for Research and Training pathways (SMART): an analysis of prospective cohort study of UK medical students.

Gokul Parameswaran, Amelia Bowman, Catherine Swales, Setthasorn Zhi Yang Ooi, Shie Wei Chan, Priya Rose Babu, Daniele Ramsay, Sofia Kostoudi, Soham Bandyopadhyay, SMART-NANSIG-InCiSion Collaborative

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Gokul ParameswaranMedical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Amelia BowmanMedical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Catherine SwalesMedical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Setthasorn Zhi Yang OoiCardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Shie Wei ChanCardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Priya Rose BabuCardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Daniele RamsayImperial University School of Medicine, London, UK.
Sofia KostoudiSchool of Medicine, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, UK.
Soham BandyopadhyayClinical Neurosciences, Clinical & Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK. soham.bandyopadhyay@yahoo.co.uk.
SMART-NANSIG-InCiSion Collaborative
Cardiff University · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of St Andrews · GBImperial College London · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveClinician-scientists are critical to medical innovation and research. However, the number of clinician scientists in the UK has been declining steadily over the last decade. One of the cited reasons is poor student recruitment to academic training pathways. The SMART study aims to assess current student perceptions on research and identify key factors influencing whether a student is interested in research.

designWe conducted a cross-sectional survey study between January and May 2022.

settingThis was a multi-centre national study with data collected across 40 universities offering medical courses in the UK.

participantsParticipants were UK medical students enrolled in medicine for 21/22 academic year. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: The main outcomes were related to participant perceptions on research and whether they were interested in engaging with research in their future career. These measures were correlated with demographic and non-demographic details using regression analyses.

resultsOne thousand seven hundred seventy-four individuals participated in the SMART survey from 40 medical schools. Nearly half the participants felt there were barriers preventing them from doing research (46.67%) and almost three-quarters felt it was at least somewhat difficult to combine research with medical school (73.49%). Of the options available, most commonly students did not want to pursue an academic career (43.11%) or training pathway (42.49%). However, most participants felt it was useful to do research at medical school (59.54%) and were also interested in doing more research in the future (69.16%). Regression analysis identified many factors influencing student's perceptions of research including year of study, gender, socioeconomic status, family background, research exposure at medical school, ethnicity, and country of pre-university education.

conclusionsThe SMART study is the first of its kind in the UK, shedding light on medical student perceptions. While some express strong interest in academic careers, a larger proportion show a broader interest in research. Demographic factors like gender, parental occupation, and socioeconomic status play a role. Further exploration is needed for specific groups to address barriers, promote research, and boost academic pathway recruitment.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalCareer ChoiceCross-Sectional StudiesHumansProspective StudiesSchools, MedicalUnited KingdomCareer progressionClinical academiaCollaborative studyMedical students

Identifiers

PMID38102619
PMCPMC10725016
OpenAlexW4389775317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.