Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38102450›Full record

ArticleNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2024

Present and future of synthetic cell development.

Katarzyna P Adamala, Marileen Dogterom, Yuval Elani, Petra Schwille, Masahiro Takinoue, T-Y Dora Tang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Devising a divisome for synthetic cells.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Let There be Light! Light as an Engine and Regulator in Synthetic Cells.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Dynamic Covalent Boronate Chemistry forJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A synthetic cell phage cycle.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katarzyna P AdamalaDepartment of Genetics, Cellular Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA. kadamala@umn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1066-7207
Marileen DogteromDepartment of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands. m.dogterom@tudelft.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8803-5261
Yuval ElaniDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK. y.elani@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9603-2490
Petra SchwilleMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany. schwille@biochem.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6106-4847
Masahiro TakinoueDepartment of Computer Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan. takinoue@c.titech.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3874-2670
T-Y Dora TangMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology & Genetics, Dresden, Germany. dora.tang@uni-saarland.de.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S031537/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Artificial CellsCell DifferentiationSynthetic Biology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.