Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38102409›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2024

Dynamics of Students' Career Choice: a Conceptual Framework-Based Qualitative Analysis Focusing on Primary Care.

Eva Pfarrwaller, Hubert Maisonneuve, Camille Laurent, Milena Abbiati, Johanna Sommer, Anne Baroffio, Dagmar M Haller

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Shining the Beam on the Next Generation: A Program Evaluation of a National Workshop Focusing on Medical Student Engagement in Radiation Oncology.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. JGIM and the International Nature of General Internal Medicine.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eva PfarrwallerUniversity Institute for Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. eva.pfarrwaller@unige.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-0978-3876
Hubert MaisonneuveUniversity Institute for Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Camille LaurentUniversity College of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Milena AbbiatiUnit of Development and Research in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Johanna SommerUniversity Institute for Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Anne BaroffioUnit of Development and Research in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Dagmar M HallerUniversity Institute for Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
University of Geneva · CHUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing primary care's attractiveness as a career choice is an important task of socially accountable medical schools. Research has broadly studied influences on medical students' career choice. However, a deeper understanding of the processes behind career decision-making could support medical schools in their efforts to promote primary care careers.

objectiveTo explore the dynamics of career choice during medical school with a focus on primary care, based on a previously developed conceptual framework. APPROACH: Qualitative study using a phenomenological, inductive-deductive approach DESIGN AND

participantsIndividual interviews were conducted from May 2019 to January 2020 with 14 first-year postgraduate trainee physicians, graduates of the Faculty of Medicine in Geneva, Switzerland, purposively sampled based on their interest in primary care during undergraduate studies. The interview guide was developed to elicit narratives about career-related decision-making. Two authors coded the transcripts. Thematic analysis alternated with data collection until thematic saturation was reached. Emerging themes were discussed and refined within the research team. KEY

resultsTwo main themes emerged: (1) developing professional identity, expressed as a changing professional image from unprecise and idealistic to concrete and realistic; priorities changed from content-based to lifestyle-based preferences; (2) individual trajectories of career-related decision-making, determined by different stages of refining professional interests; students navigated this process by employing various strategies, ranging from active exploration to passive behaviors.

conclusionsThis study's narrative approach illustrates the dynamic nature of career choice and refines elements of a conceptual framework previously developed by the authors. Its findings underline the importance of exploration, for which personal experiences and observations of physicians' work are crucial. To advance efforts to make primary care a more attractive career, students must be sufficiently exposed to primary care in a safe and individualized environment and should be supported in all stages of their career choice process.

Indexed as

Career ChoicePrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchStudents, MedicalAdultDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleSwitzerlandcareer choiceprimary care physiciansqualitative researchundergraduate medical educationworkforce

Identifiers

PMID38102409
PMCPMC11254893
OpenAlexW4389817777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.