ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2024
Genetic basis of osteogenesis imperfecta from a single tertiary centre in South Africa.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic analysis, reproductive decision-making, and pregnancy outcomes in 51 Chinese osteogenesis imperfecta families.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Functional validation using a zebrafish model reclassifies the rare COL1A2 p.Gly418Ala variant as a cause of Osteogenesis Imperfecta.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Genomic testing in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMIC).European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a clinically heterogeneous disorder characterised by skeletal fragility and an increased fracture incidence. It occurs in approximately one in every 15-20,000 births and is known to vary considerably in its severity. This report aimed to use next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology to identify disease genes and causal variants in South African patients with clinical-radiological features of OI. A total of 50 affected individuals were recruited at Tygerberg Hospital's Medical Genetics clinic. Patients were selected for a gene panel test (n = 39), a single variant test (n = 1) or exome sequencing (ES) (n = 12, 7 singletons, 1 affected duo, and 1 trio), depending on funding eligibility. An in-house genomic bioinformatics pipeline was developed for the ES samples using open-source software and tools. This study's 100% diagnostic yield was largely attributable to an accurate clinical diagnosis. A causal variant in COL1A1 or COL1A2 was identified in 94% of this patient cohort, which is in line with previous studies. Interestingly, this study was the first to identify the common South African pathogenic FKBP10 variant in a patient of mixed ancestry, adding to what was previously known about this variant in our population. Additionally, a recurrent variant in COL1A2: c.1892G>T was discovered in 27 individuals (25 from three large unrelated families and two further individuals), facilitating the establishment of local testing for this variant in South African patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.