Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38102113›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

A power law describes the magnitude of adaptation in neural populations of primary visual cortex.

Elaine Tring, Mario Dipoppa, Dario L Ringach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. On the contrast response function of adapted neural populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elaine TringDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Mario DipoppaDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4454-4224
Dario L RingachDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. dario@ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6439-334X

Funding

Thalamic constraints on cortical organizationR01EY034488 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RINGACH, DARIO L · 2023 to 2025
$1.8M
Population codes and sensory discriminationR01NS116471 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RINGACH, DARIO L · 2023 to 2024
$789k
Cortical adaptation in neural populationsR21EY035064 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RINGACH, DARIO L · 2024 to 2025
$424k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY034488NEI NIH HHS R21 EY035064NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS116471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How do neural populations adapt to the time-varying statistics of sensory input? We used two-photon imaging to measure the activity of neurons in mouse primary visual cortex adapted to different sensory environments, each defined by a distinct probability distribution over a stimulus set. We find that two properties of adaptation capture how the population response to a given stimulus, viewed as a vector, changes across environments. First, the ratio between the response magnitudes is a power law of the ratio between the stimulus probabilities. Second, the response direction to a stimulus is largely invariant. These rules could be used to predict how cortical populations adapt to novel, sensory environments. Finally, we show how the power law enables the cortex to preferentially signal unexpected stimuli and to adjust the metabolic cost of its sensory representation to the entropy of the environment.

Indexed as

NeuronsPrimary Visual CortexAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsMice

Identifiers

PMID38102113
PMCPMC10724159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.