Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38102022›Full record

ReviewClinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology2024

The blink reflex and its modulation - Part 1: Physiological mechanisms.

Markus Kofler, Mark Hallett, Gian Domenico Iannetti, Viviana Versace, Jens Ellrich, Maria J Téllez, Josep Valls-Solé

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Markus KoflerDepartment of Neurology, Hochzirl Hospital, Zirl, Austria. Electronic address: markus.kofler@i-med.ac.at.
Mark HallettNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, USA. Electronic address: hallettm@ninds.nih.gov.
Gian Domenico IannettiUniversity College London, United Kingdom; Italian Institute of Technology (IIT), Rome, Italy. Electronic address: giandomenico.iannetti@gmail.com.
Viviana VersaceDepartment of Neurorehabilitation, Hospital of Vipiteno (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical Private University (PMU), Vipiteno-Sterzing, Italy. Electronic address: viviana.versace@sabes.it.
Jens EllrichFriedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany. Electronic address: jens.ellrich@fau.de.
Maria J TéllezMount Sinai West Hospital, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: maria.tellez@mountsinai.org.
Josep Valls-SoléIDIBAPS (Institut d'Investigació August Pi i Sunyer), University of Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: jvsvallvid@gmail.com.
Agaplesion Markus Hospital · DEConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEItalian Institute of Technology · ITMount Sinai Hospital · USNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · USSt Vincent’s Private Hospital Sydney · AU

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 NS999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blink reflex (BR) is a protective eye-closure reflex mediated by brainstem circuits. The BR is usually evoked by electrical supraorbital nerve stimulation but can be elicited by a variety of sensory modalities. It has a long history in clinical neurophysiology practice. Less is known, however, about the many ways to modulate the BR. Various neurophysiological techniques can be applied to examine different aspects of afferent and efferent BR modulation. In this line, classical conditioning, prepulse and paired-pulse stimulation, and BR elicitation by self-stimulation may serve to investigate various aspects of brainstem connectivity. The BR may be used as a tool to quantify top-down modulation based on implicit assessment of the value of blinking in a given situation, e.g., depending on changes in stimulus location and probability of occurrence. Understanding the role of non-nociceptive and nociceptive fibers in eliciting a BR is important to get insight into the underlying neural circuitry. Finally, the use of BRs and other brainstem reflexes under general anesthesia may help to advance our knowledge of the brainstem in areas not amenable in awake intact humans. This review summarizes talks held by the Brainstem Special Interest Group of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology at the International Congress of Clinical Neurophysiology 2022 in Geneva, Switzerland, and provides a state-of-the-art overview of the physiology of BR modulation. Understanding the principles of BR modulation is fundamental for a valid and thoughtful clinical application (reviewed in part 2) (Gunduz et al., submitted).

Indexed as

BlinkingReflexBrain StemElectric StimulationElectromyographyHumansAnesthesiaClassical conditioningPainPeripersonal spacePrepulse inhibitionProtective reflex

Identifiers

PMID38102022
PMCPMC10978309
OpenAlexW4389166414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.