Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38101826›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Associations of eHealth literacy and knowledge with preventive behaviours and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based online survey.

Jung Jae Lee, Chung Yan Poon, Siobhan O'Connor, Janet Yuen Ha Wong, Jojo Yan Yan Kwok, Edmond Pui Hang Choi, Wing Nga Tsang, Man Ping Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jung Jae LeeSchool of Nursing, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China leejay@hku.hk.ORCID 0000-0001-9704-2116
Chung Yan PoonSchool of Nursing, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Siobhan O'ConnorFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.
Janet Yuen Ha WongSchool of Nursing and Health Studies, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3000-4577
Jojo Yan Yan KwokSchool of Nursing, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7444-6935
Edmond Pui Hang ChoiSchool of Nursing, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Wing Nga TsangInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Man Ping WangSchool of Nursing, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4000-2388

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the associations of COVID-19 preventive behaviours and depressive and anxiety symptoms with eHealth literacy and COVID-19 knowledge among Korean adults.

designA cross-sectional online survey was conducted in April 2020.

settingSeoul metropolitan area in South Korea.

participants1057 Korean adults were recruited.

main outcome measuresAssociations between eHealth literacy, COVID-19 knowledge, COVID-19 preventive behaviours and psychological distress were computed using Pearson's correlation and logistic regression analyses. eHealth literacy, COVID-19 knowledge, COVID-19 preventive behaviours and psychological distress were weighted by sex and age distribution of the general population in Seoul Metropolitan area.

results68.40% (n=723) perceived high eHealth literacy level (eHEALS ≥26), while 57.43% (n=605) had high levels of COVID-19 knowledge (score ≥25). No significant association between eHealth literacy and COVID-19 knowledge was identified (r=0.05, p=0.09). eHealth literacy and COVID-19 knowledge were significantly associated with COVID-19 preventive behaviours (aOR=1.99, 95% CI 1.51 to 2.62 L; aOR=1.81, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.34, respectively). High eHealth literacy was significantly associated with anxiety symptom (aOR=1.71, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.47) and depressive symptom (aOR=1.69, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.30). COVID-19 knowledge had negative and no associations with the symptoms (aOR=0.62, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.86; aOR=0.79, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.03, respectively). High eHealth literacy with low COVID-19 knowledge was positively and significantly associated with COVID-19 preventive behaviours (aOR=2.30, 95% CI 1.52 to 3.43), and anxiety (aOR=1.81, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.01) and depressive symptoms (aOR=2.24, 95% CI 1.41 to 3.55). High eHealth literacy with high COVID-19 knowledge were significantly associated with more preventive behaviours (aOR=3.66, 95% CI 2.47 to 5.42) but no significant associations with anxiety and depressive symptoms.

conclusionWe identified that eHealth literacy and COVID-19 knowledge were not associated each other, and differently associated with individuals' COVID-19 preventive behaviours and psychological well-being. Public health strategies should pay attention to enhancing both eHealth literacy and COVID-19 knowledge levels in the public to maximise their COVID-19 preventive behaviours and mitigate their psychological distress during COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health LiteracyPsychological DistressTelemedicineAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsSurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19Depression & mood disorderseHealthHealth LiteracyPREVENTIVE MEDICINEPrimary Prevention

Identifiers

PMID38101826
PMCPMC10729161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.