ArticleEBioMedicine2024
SAMPLER: unsupervised representations for rapid analysis of whole slide tissue images.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multicenter Histology Image Integration and Multiscale Deep Learning Support Machine Learning-Enabled Pediatric Sarcoma Classification.Cancer research · 2026Article
- A deep learning framework to iDentify prOgnostically releVant cancEr Regions (DOVER) within whole slide histopathology images.Cancer letters · 2026Article
- Systematic scoping review of external validation studies of AI pathology models for lung cancer diagnosis.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Emerging AI approaches for cancer spatial omics.GigaScience · 2025Review
- Driven early detection of chronic kidney cancer disease based on machine learning technique.PloS one · 2025Article
- A Semi-Supervised Learning Framework for Classifying Colorectal Neoplasia Based on the NICE Classification.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDeep learning has revolutionized digital pathology, allowing automatic analysis of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained whole slide images (WSIs) for diverse tasks. WSIs are broken into smaller images called tiles, and a neural network encodes each tile. Many recent works use supervised attention-based models to aggregate tile-level features into a slide-level representation, which is then used for downstream analysis. Training supervised attention-based models is computationally intensive, architecture optimization of the attention module is non-trivial, and labeled data are not always available. Therefore, we developed an unsupervised and fast approach called SAMPLER to generate slide-level representations.
methodsSlide-level representations of SAMPLER are generated by encoding the cumulative distribution functions of multiscale tile-level features. To assess effectiveness of SAMPLER, slide-level representations of breast carcinoma (BRCA), non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) WSIs of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were used to train separate classifiers distinguishing tumor subtypes in FFPE and frozen WSIs. In addition, BRCA and NSCLC classifiers were externally validated on frozen WSIs. Moreover, SAMPLER's attention maps identify regions of interest, which were evaluated by a pathologist. To determine time efficiency of SAMPLER, we compared runtime of SAMPLER with two attention-based models. SAMPLER concepts were used to improve the design of a context-aware multi-head attention model (context-MHA).
findingsSAMPLER-based classifiers were comparable to state-of-the-art attention deep learning models to distinguish subtypes of BRCA (AUC = 0.911 ± 0.029), NSCLC (AUC = 0.940 ± 0.018), and RCC (AUC = 0.987 ± 0.006) on FFPE WSIs (internal test sets). However, training SAMLER-based classifiers was >100 times faster. SAMPLER models successfully distinguished tumor subtypes on both internal and external test sets of frozen WSIs. Histopathological review confirmed that SAMPLER-identified high attention tiles contained subtype-specific morphological features. The improved context-MHA distinguished subtypes of BRCA and RCC (BRCA-AUC = 0.921 ± 0.027, RCC-AUC = 0.988 ± 0.010) with increased accuracy on internal test FFPE WSIs.
interpretationOur unsupervised statistical approach is fast and effective for analyzing WSIs, with greatly improved scalability over attention-based deep learning methods. The high accuracy of SAMPLER-based classifiers and interpretable attention maps suggest that SAMPLER successfully encodes the distinct morphologies within WSIs and will be applicable to general histology image analysis problems.
fundingThis study was supported by the National Cancer Institute (Grant No. R01CA230031 and P30CA034196).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.