Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38101298›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2024

SAMPLER: unsupervised representations for rapid analysis of whole slide tissue images.

Patience Mukashyaka, Todd B Sheridan, Ali Foroughi Pour, Jeffrey H Chuang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patience MukashyakaThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA; Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA.
Todd B SheridanThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA; Department of Pathology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA.
Ali Foroughi PourThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA. Electronic address: ali.foroughipour@jax.org.
Jeffrey H ChuangThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA; Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA. Electronic address: jeff.chuang@jax.org.

Funding

Shared Resource ManagementP30CA034196 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI William Carl Skarnes · 1985 to 2026
$61.9M
Quantitative Computational Methods to Accurately Measure Tumor Heterogeneity in Solid Tumors to Inform Development of Evolution-based Treatment StrategiesR01CA230031 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI CHUANG, JEFFREY HSU-MIN · 2018 to 2022
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA034196NCI NIH HHS R01 CA230031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep learning has revolutionized digital pathology, allowing automatic analysis of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained whole slide images (WSIs) for diverse tasks. WSIs are broken into smaller images called tiles, and a neural network encodes each tile. Many recent works use supervised attention-based models to aggregate tile-level features into a slide-level representation, which is then used for downstream analysis. Training supervised attention-based models is computationally intensive, architecture optimization of the attention module is non-trivial, and labeled data are not always available. Therefore, we developed an unsupervised and fast approach called SAMPLER to generate slide-level representations.

methodsSlide-level representations of SAMPLER are generated by encoding the cumulative distribution functions of multiscale tile-level features. To assess effectiveness of SAMPLER, slide-level representations of breast carcinoma (BRCA), non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) WSIs of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were used to train separate classifiers distinguishing tumor subtypes in FFPE and frozen WSIs. In addition, BRCA and NSCLC classifiers were externally validated on frozen WSIs. Moreover, SAMPLER's attention maps identify regions of interest, which were evaluated by a pathologist. To determine time efficiency of SAMPLER, we compared runtime of SAMPLER with two attention-based models. SAMPLER concepts were used to improve the design of a context-aware multi-head attention model (context-MHA).

findingsSAMPLER-based classifiers were comparable to state-of-the-art attention deep learning models to distinguish subtypes of BRCA (AUC = 0.911 ± 0.029), NSCLC (AUC = 0.940 ± 0.018), and RCC (AUC = 0.987 ± 0.006) on FFPE WSIs (internal test sets). However, training SAMLER-based classifiers was >100 times faster. SAMPLER models successfully distinguished tumor subtypes on both internal and external test sets of frozen WSIs. Histopathological review confirmed that SAMPLER-identified high attention tiles contained subtype-specific morphological features. The improved context-MHA distinguished subtypes of BRCA and RCC (BRCA-AUC = 0.921 ± 0.027, RCC-AUC = 0.988 ± 0.010) with increased accuracy on internal test FFPE WSIs.

interpretationOur unsupervised statistical approach is fast and effective for analyzing WSIs, with greatly improved scalability over attention-based deep learning methods. The high accuracy of SAMPLER-based classifiers and interpretable attention maps suggest that SAMPLER successfully encodes the distinct morphologies within WSIs and will be applicable to general histology image analysis problems.

fundingThis study was supported by the National Cancer Institute (Grant No. R01CA230031 and P30CA034196).

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsFemaleHumansDeep learningDigital pathologyMultiple instance learningRepresentation learningUnsupervised learningWSI representation

Identifiers

PMID38101298
PMCPMC10733087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.