ReviewAnnual review of public health2024
Conceptualizing and Measuring Trust, Mistrust, and Distrust: Implications for Advancing Health Equity and Building Trustworthiness.
Review in Annual review of public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Culturally Tailored Messages and Trial Registry Enrollment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Earning Trust Before the Crisis: Health Literacy and Communication Readiness in Healthcare Systems.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Caregiver and Patient Input for Quality and Safety (C-PIQS) Pilot Study: Patient-Initiated Safety Observations Using an m-Health Tool.Journal of patient safety · 2026Observational
- Participant Perspectives on Data Sharing in Clinical Craniofacial Research: Qualitative Interviews With Participants With Craniofacial Microsomia and Their Caregivers.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026Article
- Role of trust and trustworthiness in implementation science studies: a systematic review protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Healthcare experiences and the cycle of genomic healthcare disparities: A cross-sectional study utilizing the 'All of Us' research program.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Understanding Black Women's Lived Experiences of Medical Mistrust and Trust in the Reproductive Care Setting: A Nested Sequential Explanatory Mixed Methods Study.Research square · 2026Article
- Hospital Safety Index in Thailand: Emergency Staff Perspectives on Preparedness and Trust.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Design of a mobile mental health stigma reduction application for depression and anxiety: User centered design.SSM. Mental health · 2026Article
- Perceived Discrimination and Healthcare System Trust as Barriers to Survivorship Care in Endometrial Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Social Context Considerations for Future HIV Vaccine Introduction and Implementation.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Breaking Barriers: Exploring Patient Satisfaction With the U.S. Healthcare System Among Iranian and Afghan Immigrants With Limited English Proficiency.Health services research · 2026Article
- Trust in Healthcare Providers Among American Indians in the Midwest.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- PMToxics · 2026Article
- Healthcare team trust, care coordination, and care access among cancer survivors with multiple chronic conditions: a mixed method analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- No short cuts: building trust in community-based research with ethnocultural groups.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- The impact of pharmacist-led medication therapy management on the efficacy of cancer pain control: a pre-post interventional study.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2026Article
- Bridging the trust gap: insights from students on rebuilding confidence in public health.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- From screening to enrollment drop-offs: perspectives of minoritized participants in Indiana.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- (Mis)trust among patients seeking unproven stem cell therapies: a qualitative analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Trust is vital to public confidence in health and science, yet there is no consensus on the most useful way to conceptualize, define, measure, or intervene on trust and its related constructs (e.g., mistrust, distrust, and trustworthiness). In this review, we synthesize literature from this wide-ranging field that has conceptual roots in racism, marginalization, and other forms of oppression. We summarize key definitions and conceptual frameworks and offer guidance to scholars aiming to measure these constructs. We also review how trust-related constructs are associated with health outcomes, describe interventions in this field, and provide recommendations for building trust and institutional trustworthiness and advancing health equity. We ultimately call for future efforts to focus on improving the trustworthiness of public health professionals, scientists, health care providers, and systems instead of aiming to increase trust in these entities as they currently exist and behave.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.