Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38100393›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2023

GPT-4 can pass the Korean National Licensing Examination for Korean Medicine Doctors.

Dongyeop Jang, Tae-Rim Yun, Choong-Yeol Lee, Young-Kyu Kwon, Chang-Eop Kim

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
22.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Prompt Engineering in Clinical Practice: Tutorial for Clinicians.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dongyeop JangDepartment of Physiology, College of Korean Medicine, Gachon University, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3546-8389
Tae-Rim YunDepartment of Physiology, College of Korean Medicine, Gachon University, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Choong-Yeol LeeDepartment of Physiology, College of Korean Medicine, Gachon University, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Young-Kyu KwonDivision of Integrated Art Therapy, School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3823-5799
Chang-Eop KimDepartment of Physiology, College of Korean Medicine, Gachon University, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8281-9148
Gachon University · KRPusan National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional Korean medicine (TKM) emphasizes individualized diagnosis and treatment. This uniqueness makes AI modeling difficult due to limited data and implicit processes. Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive medical inference, even without advanced training in medical texts. This study assessed the capabilities of GPT-4 in TKM, using the Korean National Licensing Examination for Korean Medicine Doctors (K-NLEKMD) as a benchmark. The K-NLEKMD, administered by a national organization, encompasses 12 major subjects in TKM. GPT-4 answered 340 questions from the 2022 K-NLEKMD. We optimized prompts with Chinese-term annotation, English translation for questions and instruction, exam-optimized instruction, and self-consistency. GPT-4 with optimized prompts achieved 66.18% accuracy, surpassing both the examination's average pass mark of 60% and the 40% minimum for each subject. The gradual introduction of language-related prompts and prompting techniques enhanced the accuracy from 51.82% to its maximum accuracy. GPT-4 showed low accuracy in subjects including public health & medicine-related law, internal medicine (2), and acupuncture medicine which are highly localized in Korea and TKM. The model's accuracy was lower for questions requiring TKM-specialized knowledge than those that did not. It exhibited higher accuracy in diagnosis-based and recall-based questions than in intervention-based questions. A significant positive correlation was observed between the consistency and accuracy of GPT-4's responses. This study unveils both the potential and challenges of applying LLMs to TKM. These findings underline the potential of LLMs like GPT-4 in culturally adapted medicine, especially TKM, for tasks such as clinical assistance, medical education, and research. But they also point towards the necessity for the development of methods to mitigate cultural bias inherent in large language models and validate their efficacy in real-world clinical settings.

Identifiers

PMID38100393
PMCPMC10723673
OpenAlexW4389795202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.