Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38100200›Full record

ReviewJMIR medical informatics2023

Applying Natural Language Processing to Textual Data From Clinical Data Warehouses: Systematic Review.

Adrien Bazoge, Emmanuel Morin, Béatrice Daille, Pierre-Antoine Gourraud

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR medical informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Development of a natural language processing algorithm to extract social determinants of health from clinician notes.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Centralized and Federated Models for the Analysis of Clinical Data.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adrien BazogeNantes Université, École Centrale Nantes, CNRS, LS2N, UMR 6004, F-44000 Nantes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9723-9688
Emmanuel MorinNantes Université, École Centrale Nantes, CNRS, LS2N, UMR 6004, F-44000 Nantes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8208-7039
Béatrice DailleNantes Université, École Centrale Nantes, CNRS, LS2N, UMR 6004, F-44000 Nantes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9095-7372
Pierre-Antoine GourraudNantes Université, CHU de Nantes, Pôle Hospitalo-Universitaire 11: Santé Publique, Clinique des données, INSERM, CIC 1413, F-44000 Nantes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1131-9554

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, health data collected during the clinical care process have been often repurposed for secondary use through clinical data warehouses (CDWs), which interconnect disparate data from different sources. A large amount of information of high clinical value is stored in unstructured text format. Natural language processing (NLP), which implements algorithms that can operate on massive unstructured textual data, has the potential to structure the data and make clinical information more accessible.

objectiveThe aim of this review was to provide an overview of studies applying NLP to textual data from CDWs. It focuses on identifying the (1) NLP tasks applied to data from CDWs and (2) NLP methods used to tackle these tasks.

methodsThis review was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We searched for relevant articles in 3 bibliographic databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, and ACL Anthology. We reviewed the titles and abstracts and included articles according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) focus on NLP applied to textual data from CDWs, (2) articles published between 1995 and 2021, and (3) written in English.

resultsWe identified 1353 articles, of which 194 (14.34%) met the inclusion criteria. Among all identified NLP tasks in the included papers, information extraction from clinical text (112/194, 57.7%) and the identification of patients (51/194, 26.3%) were the most frequent tasks. To address the various tasks, symbolic methods were the most common NLP methods (124/232, 53.4%), showing that some tasks can be partially achieved with classical NLP techniques, such as regular expressions or pattern matching that exploit specialized lexica, such as drug lists and terminologies. Machine learning (70/232, 30.2%) and deep learning (38/232, 16.4%) have been increasingly used in recent years, including the most recent approaches based on transformers. NLP methods were mostly applied to English language data (153/194, 78.9%).

conclusionsCDWs are central to the secondary use of clinical texts for research purposes. Although the use of NLP on data from CDWs is growing, there remain challenges in this field, especially with regard to languages other than English. Clinical NLP is an effective strategy for accessing, extracting, and transforming data from CDWs. Information retrieved with NLP can assist in clinical research and have an impact on clinical practice.

Indexed as

AIartificial intelligenceclinical data warehousedata warehousingnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID38100200
PMCPMC10757232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.