Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38100175›Full record

ArticleLiver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society2024

Neighborhood-level social determinants of health measures independently predict receipt of living donor liver transplantation in the United States.

Mounika Kanneganti, Elena Byhoff, Marina Serper, Kim M Olthoff, Therese Bittermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Role of social determinants and outcomes of patients with alcohol-associated liver disease referred for early liver transplantation: A multicenter analysis.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mounika KannegantiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3262-7054
Elena ByhoffDepartment of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Marina SerperDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4899-2160
Kim M OlthoffDivision of Transplant Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5181-7502
Therese BittermannDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8576-0193

Funding

Impact of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor therapy on aging-related outcomesR01AG079911 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI David E Kaplan, DOUGLAS EARL SCHAUBEL · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
Impact of immunosuppression variability on outcomes after liver transplantationK08DK117013 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BITTERMANN, THERESE · 2018 to 2022
$932k
Increasing SNAP enrollment in a diverse Latinx communityK23MD015267 · NIMHD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI BYHOFF, ELENA · 2020 to 2024
$817k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG079911NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK117013NIMHD NIH HHS K23 MD015267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disparities exist in the access to living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the United States. However, the association of neighborhood-level social determinants of health (SDoH) on the receipt of LDLT is not well-established. This was a retrospective cohort study of adult liver transplant recipients between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2021 at centers performing LDLT using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, which was linked through patients' ZIP code to a set of 24 neighborhood-level SDoH measures from different data sources. Temporal trends and center differences in neighborhood Social Deprivation Index (SDI), a validated scale of socioeconomic deprivation ranging from 0 to 100 (0=least disadvantaged), were assessed by transplant type. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the association of increasing SDI on receipt of LDLT [vs. deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT)]. There were 51,721 DDLT and 4026 LDLT recipients at 59 LDLT-performing centers during the study period. Of the 24 neighborhood-level SDoH measures studied, the SDI was most different between the 2 transplant types, with LDLT recipients having lower SDI (ie, less socioeconomic disadvantage) than DDLT recipients (median SDI 37 vs. 47; p < 0.001). The median difference in SDI between the LDLT and DDLT groups significantly decreased from 13 in 2005 to 3 in 2021 ( p = 0.003). In the final model, the SDI quintile was independently associated with transplant type ( p < 0.001) with a threshold SDI of ~40, above which increasing SDI was significantly associated with reduced odds of LDLT (vs. reference SDI 1-20). As a neighborhood-level SDoH measure, SDI is useful for evaluating disparities in the context of LDLT. Center outreach efforts that aim to reduce disparities in LDLT could preferentially target US ZIP codes with SDI > 40.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesLiver TransplantationLiving DonorsSocial Determinants of HealthAdultAgedEnd Stage Liver DiseaseFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeighborhood CharacteristicsResidence CharacteristicsRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID38100175
PMCPMC13478966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.