Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38100105›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Racial Equity in Living Donor Kidney Transplant Centers, 2008-2018.

Lisa M McElroy, Tyler Schappe, Dinushika Mohottige, LaShara Davis, Sarah B Peskoe, Virginia Wang, Jane Pendergast, L Ebony Boulware

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa M McElroyDepartment of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Tyler SchappeDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Dinushika MohottigeInstitute of Health Equity Research and Barbara T. Murphy Division of Nephrology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
LaShara DavisDepartment of Surgery and J. C. Walter Jr Transplant Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Sarah B PeskoeDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Virginia WangDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Jane PendergastDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
L Ebony BoulwareWake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina.
Duke University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMethodist Hospital · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

Support for QA/QC for Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002553 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JENNIFER S, MCNAMARA, JAMES O. · 2018 to 2023
$58.5M
Research Project 3U54MD012530 · NIMHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, KIMBERLY S. · 2017 to 2022
$8.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002553NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD012530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: It is unclear whether center-level factors are associated with racial equity in living donor kidney transplant (LDKT). Objective: To evaluate center-level factors and racial equity in LDKT during an 11-year time period. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort longitudinal study was completed in February 2023, of US transplant centers with at least 12 annual LDKTs from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2018, identified in the Health Resources Services Administration database and linked to the US Renal Data System and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Main Outcomes and Measures: Observed and model-based estimated Black-White mean LDKT rate ratios (RRs), where an RR of 1 indicates racial equity and values less than 1 indicate a lower rate of LDKT of Black patients compared with White patients. Estimated yearly best-case center-specific LDKT RRs between Black and White individuals, where modifiable center characteristics were set to values that would facilitate access to LDKT. Results: The final cohorts of patients included 394 625 waitlisted adults, of whom 33.1% were Black and 66.9% were White, and 57 222 adult LDKT recipients, of whom 14.1% were Black and 85.9% were White. Among 89 transplant centers, estimated yearly center-level RRs between Black and White individuals accounting for center and population characteristics ranged from 0.0557 in 2008 to 0.771 in 2018. The yearly median RRs ranged from 0.216 in 2016 to 0.285 in 2010. Model-based estimations for the hypothetical best-case scenario resulted in little change in the minimum RR (from 0.0557 to 0.0549), but a greater positive shift in the maximum RR from 0.771 to 0.895. Relative to the observed 582 LDKT in Black patients and 3837 in White patients, the 2018 hypothetical model estimated an increase of 423 (a 72.7% increase) LDKTs for Black patients and of 1838 (a 47.9% increase) LDKTs for White patients. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with kidney failure, no substantial improvement occurred over time either in the observed or the covariate-adjusted estimated RRs. Under the best-case hypothetical estimations, modifying centers' participation in the paired exchange and voucher programs and increased access to public insurance may contribute to improved racial equity in LDKT. Additional work is needed to identify center-level and program-specific strategies to improve racial equity in access to LDKT.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationAdultCohort StudiesHumansLiving DonorsLongitudinal StudiesRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID38100105
PMCPMC10724764
OpenAlexW4389794747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.