ReviewIndian journal of pediatrics2024
Shortened Treatment Regimens for Drug Sensitive TB.
Review in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting radiological severity of pulmonary tuberculosis in children: an assessment of the WHO-criteria and novel prediction scores on an individual participant dataset.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Anti-tuberculosis drug treatment and adverse reactions in 546 children with tuberculosis in Chongqing, China: A 10-year retrospective study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Cartridge Based Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (CBNAAT) in Stool Samples in Pediatric Tuberculosis: Correspondence.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Cartridge Based Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (CBNAAT) in Stool Samples in Pediatric Tuberculosis: Authors' Reply.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Pediatric Tuberculosis: A Comprehensive Overview.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) has remained a global health challenge despite the availability of effective anti-tubercular drugs and various treatment strategies. Apart from the complications related to TB disease per se, adverse effects of antitubercular therapy (ATT) also contribute to morbidity. In addition to the adverse effects, the long duration of the treatment regimen also reduces the patient's acceptability of ATT. The available "short-course treatment regimens" are still relatively long, thereby adversely affecting treatment compliance. There is a need for effective, safe, short and intensive regimens for TB which can reduce the treatment cost and adverse effects, thereby improving its acceptance. With the emergence of new evidence, the World Health Organization (WHO) has recently endorsed 4 mo short duration ATT regimen for non-severe, drug-sensitive cases of tuberculosis. Even in severe forms of disease like tubercular meningitis (TBM), trials are underway evaluating efficacy and safety of shorter regimens. Inclusion of fluroquinolones and rifapentine help shorten the regimens. These shortened regimens, however, need more close monitoring for adverse effects and may need to be converted to longer course if there is inadequate clinical response. Thus, shorter regimens for pediatric TB are likely to not only decrease the burden on patients and healthcare but also improve compliance and lower the side effects of the drugs due to prolonged exposure. This article reviews the current evidence and the guidelines pertaining to the shortened, intensive regimens for drug-sensitive tuberculosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.