SynthesisIndian journal of pediatrics2024
Periodic Rotation versus Continuous Application of Same Nasal Interface for Non-invasive Respiratory Support in Preterm Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Noninvasive Ventilation Strategies in Neonates.Indian pediatrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo review whether the periodic rotation of nasal mask with binasal prongs is superior to continuous application of either of the interfaces in preterm infants on non-invasive positive pressure respiratory support.
methodThe authors searched Medline, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing periodic rotation of the two interfaces (mask or prongs) against the continuous application of either, in preterm infants on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) or nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). They performed a random-effects meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4. The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate to severe nasal injury. Other outcomes included any nasal injury, need for invasive ventilation, duration of respiratory support, hospital stay, and mortality.
resultsFour RCTs (520 participants) were included. There was no difference in the incidence of moderate to severe nasal injury between periodic rotation vs. continuous nasal mask (3 RCTs, 293 participants; RR: 1.75, 95% CI: 0.73-4.19), or periodic rotation vs. continuous binasal prongs (3 RCTs, 296 participants; RR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.14-1.11). Periodic rotation lowered the incidence of any grade nasal injury compared to continuous binasal prongs (RR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.49-0.75) but not compared to continuous nasal mask (RR: 1.38, 95% CI: 0.92-2.06). Periodic rotation was associated with longer non-invasive respiratory support (compared to prongs) and prolonged hospital stay (compared to masks). There were no significant differences in other clinical outcomes.
conclusionsAmong preterm infants receiving non-invasive respiratory support, periodically rotating a nasal mask with short binasal prongs may not be superior to the continuous application of nasal masks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.