ArticleEuropean radiology2024
Smart forecasting of artifacts in contrast-enhanced breast MRI before contrast agent administration.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of co-registration on lesion characterization in diffusion-weighted breast MRI.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Can AI Detect What Is Not Injected? Evaluation of Lesion Detection in Virtual Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI Using a Large-Scale AI Model Trained on GBCA-Enhanced Data.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- Comparison of three arm-positioning techniques for minimizing motion artifacts in breast magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective volunteer study.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- Advancing breast cancer diagnosis: a combined approach using deep learning-reconstructed diffusion-weighted imaging and Synthetic MRI.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Including AI in diffusion-weighted breast MRI has potential to increase reader confidence and reduce workload.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Virtual contrast-enhanced maximum intensity projections from high-b-value diffusion-weighted breast MRI: a feasibility study.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- Two-parametric prescan calibration of gradient-induced sampling errors for rosette MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Pre-injection anticipation of artifacts in contrast-enhanced breast MRI: artificial intelligence harnessed for the aid once again.European radiology · 2024Article
- Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Skin Pathologies of the Breast-A Feasibility Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate whether artifacts on contrast-enhanced (CE) breast MRI maximum intensity projections (MIPs) might already be forecast before gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) administration during an ongoing examination by analyzing the unenhanced T1-weighted images acquired before the GBCA injection. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis IRB-approved retrospective analysis consisted of n = 2884 breast CE MRI examinations after intravenous administration of GBCA, acquired with n = 4 different MRI devices at different field strengths (1.5 T/3 T) during clinical routine. CE-derived subtraction MIPs were used to conduct a multi-class multi-reader evaluation of the presence and severity of artifacts with three independent readers. An ensemble classifier (EC) of five DenseNet models was used to predict artifacts for the post-contrast subtraction MIPs, giving as the input source only the pre-contrast T1-weighted sequence. Thus, the acquisition directly preceded the GBCA injection. The area under ROC (AuROC) and diagnostics accuracy scores were used to assess the performance of the neural network in an independent holdout test set (n = 285).
resultsAfter majority voting, potentially significant artifacts were detected in 53.6% (n = 1521) of all breast MRI examinations (age 49.6 ± 12.6 years). In the holdout test set (mean age 49.7 ± 11.8 years), at a specificity level of 89%, the EC could forecast around one-third of artifacts (sensitivity 31%) before GBCA administration, with an AuROC = 0.66.
conclusionThis study demonstrates the capability of a neural network to forecast the occurrence of artifacts on CE subtraction data before the GBCA administration. If confirmed in larger studies, this might enable a workflow-blended approach to prevent breast MRI artifacts by implementing in-scan personalized predictive algorithms. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Some artifacts in contrast-enhanced breast MRI maximum intensity projections might be predictable before gadolinium-based contrast agent injection using a neural network. KEY POINTS: • Potentially significant artifacts can be observed in a relevant proportion of breast MRI subtraction sequences after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration (GBCA). • Forecasting the occurrence of such artifacts in subtraction maximum intensity projections before GBCA administration for individual patients was feasible at 89% specificity, which allowed correctly predicting one in three future artifacts. • Further research is necessary to investigate the clinical value of such smart personalized imaging approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.