Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38099859›Full record

Trial reportHepatology communications2024

A randomized trial of mailed outreach with behavioral economic interventions to improve liver cancer surveillance.

Shivan J Mehta, Caitlin McDonald, Catherine Reitz, Shivani Kastuar, Christopher K Snider, Evelyn Okorie, Kiernan McNelis, Hamzah Shaikh, Tessa S Cook, David S Goldberg and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hepatology communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Health disparities in cirrhosis care and liver transplantation.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shivan J MehtaDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6066-4739
Caitlin McDonaldDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Catherine ReitzDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Shivani KastuarDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Christopher K SniderCenter for Health Care Innovation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Evelyn OkorieDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Kiernan McNelisDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Hamzah ShaikhDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Tessa S CookDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
David S GoldbergDepartment of Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
Kenneth RothsteinDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

Funding

Behavioral Economics and Population-based Colorectal Cancer ScreeningK08CA234326 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MEHTA, SHIVAN JATIN · 2018 to 2022
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA234326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurveillance rates for HCC remain limited in patients with cirrhosis. We evaluated whether opt-out mailed outreach increased uptake with or without a $20 unconditional incentive.

methodsThis was a pragmatic randomized controlled trial in an urban academic health system including adult patients with cirrhosis or advanced fibrosis, at least 1 visit to a specialty practice in the past 2 years and no surveillance in the last 7 months. Patients were randomized in a 1:2:2 ratio to (1) usual care, (2) a mailed letter with a signed order for an ultrasound, or (3) a mailed letter with an order and a $20 unconditional incentive. The main outcome was the proportion with completion of ultrasound within 6 months.

resultsAmong the 562 patients included, the mean age was 62.1 (SD 11.1); 56.8% were male, 51.1% had Medicare, and 40.6% were Black. At 6 months, 27.6% (95% CI: 19.5-35.7) completed ultrasound in the Usual care arm, 54.5% (95% CI: 47.9-61.0) in the Letter + Order arm, and 54.1% (95% CI: 47.5-60.6) in the Letter + Order + Incentive arm. There was a significant increase in the Letter + Order arm compared to Usual care (absolute difference of 26.9%; 95% CI: 16.5-37.3; p<0.001), but no significant increase in the Letter + Order + Incentive arm compared to Letter + Order (absolute difference of -0.4; 95% CI: -9.7 to 8.8; p=0.93).

conclusionsThere was an increase in HCC surveillance from mailed outreach with opt-out framing and a signed order slip, but no increase in response to the financial incentive.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsAdultAgedEconomics, BehavioralFemaleHumansLiver CirrhosisMaleMedicareMiddle AgedUnited States

Identifiers

PMID38099859
PMCPMC10727671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.