ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2024
Sex as a biological variable for cardiovascular physiology.
Review in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physiological influences on neurovascular coupling: A systematic review of multimodal imaging approaches and recommendations for future study designs.Experimental physiology · 2025Pooled it
- Trial
- Sex-specific assumptions underlie cardiovascular digital twin technologies: A narrative review.PLOS digital health · 2026Review
- Assessing health in aging male and female mice: does cardiac function dictate frailty or physical resilience?The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026Article
- Mutant CHCHD10 disrupts cytochrome c oxidation and activates mitochondrial retrograde signaling.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Effects of Isovolumic Loading Elicited Either by 3-Branch or by 4-Branch Spring Expander on the Degree of Cardiac Atrophy of the Failing Heart in Rats After Heterotopic Heart Transplantation: No Evidence for Sex-Linked Differences.Physiological research · 2025Article
- Sex-specific effects of mild kidney dysfunction on vascular function in midlife and older adults.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2025Article
- Progress on incorporating sex as a biological variable in cardiovascular research.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2025Article
- Role of overweight and obesity on vascular responses to the cold pressor test and hypoxia in women.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2025Article
- Sex-specific response to A1BG loss results in female dilated cardiomyopathy.Biology of sex differences · 2025Article
- Gene expression profiles, potential targets and treatments of cardiac remodeling.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2025Review
- Interaction of simultaneous hypoxia and baroreflex loading on control of sympathetic action potential subpopulations.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Sex- and Age-Specific Differences in Mice Fed a Ketogenic Diet.Nutrients · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
There have been ongoing efforts by federal agencies and scientific communities since the early 1990s to incorporate sex and/or gender in all aspects of cardiovascular research. Scientific journals provide a critical function as change agents to influence transformation by encouraging submissions for topic areas, and by setting standards and expectations for articles submitted to the journal. As part of ongoing efforts to advance sex and gender in cardiovascular physiology research, the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.