Trial reportInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2023
Optic Nerve Subarachnoid Space Posture Dependency - An MRI Study in Subjects With Normal Tension Glaucoma and Healthy Controls.
Trial report in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Rebalancing translaminar pressure difference: a novel glaucoma surgery-a pilot trial in non-human primates.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Author Response: Deficient Optic Nerve Sheath Occlusion in NTG Patients: Optic Nerve Damage Due to Translaminar Pressure Imbalance, Glymphatic Failure, or Both?Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Deficient Optic Nerve Sheath Occlusion in NTG Patients: Optic Nerve Damage Due to Translaminar Pressure Imbalance, Glymphatic Failure, or Both?Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Surgical management of chronic sixth cranial nerve palsy: case report and literature review.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the differences of optic nerve subarachnoid space (ONSAS) volume in patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG) and healthy controls in different body positions. Methods: Eight patients with NTG and seven healthy controls underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations in head up tilt (HUT) +11 degrees and head down tilt (HDT) -5 degrees positions according to a randomized protocol determining the starting position. The ONSAS volume in both body positions was measured and compared between the two groups. The results were analyzed using a generalized linear model. Results: Between HDT and HUT, the postural ONSAS volume change was dependent on starting position (P < 0.001) and group (P = 0.003, NTG versus healthy). A subgroup analysis of those that were randomized to HUT examination first, coming directly from an upright position, showed that the patients with NTG had significantly larger positional ONSAS volume changes compared to the healthy controls; 121 ± 22 µL vs. 65 ± 37 µL (P = 0.049). Analysis of the ONSAS volume distribution showed different profiles for patients with NTG and healthy controls. Conclusions: There was a significant difference in ONSAS volume change between patients with NTG and healthy subjects when subjected to posture changes, specifically when going from upright to head-down posture. This indicates that patients with NTG had been exposed to a lower ONSAS pressure when they came from the upright posture, which suggests an increased translaminar pressure difference in upright position. This may support the theory that NTG has a dysfunction in an occlusion mechanism of the optic nerve sheath that could cause abnormally negative ONSAS pressures in upright posture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.