ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2023
Morphology-based deep learning approach for predicting adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs).
Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surface-modified 3D-printed sphene scaffolds for photothermal osteosarcoma therapy and osteogenic stimulation.Bioactive materials · 2027Article
- AI for bioactive materials: From material design to biological applications.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- From pixels to patterns: the AI revolution in stem cell-derived models.Nature methods · 2026Review
- Materiobiology-guided regulation of mesenchymal stromal cell fate for aging-related diseases: From basic parameter design to clinical application.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Cellular Morphometric Analysis (CellMorph)-a comprehensive imaging-based tool for quantifying cellular phenotype heterogeneity and dynamics across biological processes.The FEBS journal · 2026Article
- Review
- Deep learning for predicting stem cell efficiency for use in beta cell differentiation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Automated bone marrow cell classification using ensemble learning: performance, generalization, and clinical interpretability.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in orthopedic regenerative medicine: from design to clinical translational pathways.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Advancing the 3Rs in bone tissue engineering: emergingFrontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Chondrogenic Differentiation of Stem Cells for Cartilage Regeneration: Advances and Future Perspectives.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2026Review
- Machine Learning in Stem Cell Research: From Biological Data to Clinical Translation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- OsteoNet: A deep learning framework linking cellular morphology to molecular markers for quantifying osteogenic differentiation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Driven Innovation: Advancing Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapies and Intelligent Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Differential Phase Contrast Imaging to Predict MSC Immune Function.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- Current Trends and Future Opportunities of AI-Based Analysis in Mesenchymal Stem Cell Imaging: A Scoping Review.Journal of imaging · 2025Review
- Application of Machine Learning in Predicting Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Metabolic markers detect early ostedifferentiation of mesenchymal stem cells from multiple donors.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Article
- Bottom-up Biomaterial strategies for creating tailored stem cells in regenerative medicine.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) are multipotent progenitor cells with the potential to differentiate into various cell types, including osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes. These cells have been extensively employed in the field of cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine due to their inherent attributes of self-renewal and multipotency. Traditional approaches for assessing hMSCs differentiation capacity have relied heavily on labor-intensive techniques, such as RT-PCR, immunostaining, and Western blot, to identify specific biomarkers. However, these methods are not only time-consuming and economically demanding, but also require the fixation of cells, resulting in the loss of temporal data. Consequently, there is an emerging need for a more efficient and precise approach to predict hMSCs differentiation in live cells, particularly for osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation. In response to this need, we developed innovative approaches that combine live-cell imaging with cutting-edge deep learning techniques, specifically employing a convolutional neural network (CNN) to meticulously classify osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation. Specifically, four notable pre-trained CNN models, VGG 19, Inception V3, ResNet 18, and ResNet 50, were developed and tested for identifying adipogenic and osteogenic differentiated cells based on cell morphology changes. We rigorously evaluated the performance of these four models concerning binary and multi-class classification of differentiated cells at various time intervals, focusing on pivotal metrics such as accuracy, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, precision, and F1-score. Among these four different models, ResNet 50 has proven to be the most effective choice with the highest accuracy (0.9572 for binary, 0.9474 for multi-class) and AUC (0.9958 for binary, 0.9836 for multi-class) in both multi-class and binary classification tasks. Although VGG 19 matched the accuracy of ResNet 50 in both tasks, ResNet 50 consistently outperformed it in terms of AUC, underscoring its superior effectiveness in identifying differentiated cells. Overall, our study demonstrated the capability to use a CNN approach to predict stem cell fate based on morphology changes, which will potentially provide insights for the application of cell-based therapy and advance our understanding of regenerative medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.