Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38099212›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular bioengineering2023

Nuclear Entry of DNA and Transgene Expression in Dividing and Non-dividing Cells.

Justin Sylvers, Yifei Wang, Fan Yuan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular bioengineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prime Editing in Dividing and Quiescent Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Nano Approaches to Nucleic Acid Delivery: Barriers, Solutions, and Current Landscape.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Justin SylversDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708 USA.
Yifei WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708 USA.
Fan YuanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0687-6607
Duke University · US

Funding

Chemically Assisted Electrotransfer of DNAR35GM145362 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FAN YUAN · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
Non-Canonical Pathways for Electrogene TransferR01GM130830 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI YUAN, FAN · 2018 to 2021
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM130830NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM145362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Plasmid DNA (pDNA) must be delivered into the nucleus for transgene expression in mammalian cells. The entry may happen passively during the nuclear envelope breakdown and reformation in dividing cells or actively through the nuclear pore complexes. The goal of this study was to investigate the relative importance of these two pathways for pDNA nuclear entry and subsequent gene expression. Methods: To measure nuclear entry of pDNA encoding enhanced green florescence protein (EGFP) in electrotransfected cells, we developed a sensitive technique for quantitative analysis of pDNA in the nuclei, based on a hybridization probe for pDNA detection at the single molecule level and automatic image analysis. In matched experiments, we used an mRNA targeted hybridization probe to quantify reporter mRNA expression per cell, and flow cytometry to quantify expression of EGFP. Results: We discovered two distinct patterns of pDNA distribution in the nuclei: punctate and diffuse, which were dominant in arrested and unarrested cells, respectively. The cell cycle arrest decreased diffuse pDNA and increased punctate pDNA. Its net effect was a decrease in the total intranuclear pDNA. Additionally, the cell cycle arrest increased the reporter mRNA synthesis but had no substantial impact on reporter protein expression. Conclusion: Results from the study demonstrated that the efficient nuclear entry of pDNA during cell division did not necessarily lead to a high level of transgene expression. They also suggested that the punctate pDNA was more transcriptionally active than diffuse pDNA in the nuclei. These data will be useful in future studies for understanding mechanisms of nonviral gene delivery.

Indexed as

DNA nuclear entryElectrotransfectionNonviral gene delivery

Identifiers

PMID38099212
PMCPMC10716082
OpenAlexW4386811875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.