Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38099203›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2023

Challenges and innovations in brain PET analysis of neurodegenerative disorders: a mini-review on partial volume effects, small brain region studies, and reference region selection.

Prabesh Kanel, Giulia Carli, Robert Vangel, Stiven Roytman, Nicolaas I Bohnen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. SV2A PET reveals synaptic density loss in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and in a pilot multiple sclerosis study.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. PET Imaging of the Human Brain with Microvolumetric Spatial Resolution.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Prabesh KanelDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Giulia CarliMorris K. Udall Center of Excellence for Parkinson's Disease Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Robert VangelDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Stiven RoytmanDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Nicolaas I BohnenDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Funding

Tomography and Data AnalysisP01NS015655 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FREY, KIRK A. · 1985 to 2012
$13.0M
Udall Catalyst Research Project: Retrosplenial Cholinergic and Attentional-Motor Integration DysfunctionP50NS123067 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI AHMED, OMAR JAMIL · 2021 to 2025
$11.6M
Public Outreach and Education CoreP50NS091856 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DAUER, WILLIAM T. · 2014 to 2019
$10.1M
Hyposmia, Cholinergic Denervation and Incipient Cognitive Decline in PDR01NS070856 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BOHNEN, NICOLAAS IDA · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
Amyloidopathy, cholinopathy, dopamine responsiveness and freezing of gait in PDI01RX001631 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI BOHNEN, NICOLAAS IDA · 2016 to 2020
–
NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS015655NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS091856NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS123067NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS070856RRD VA I01 RX001631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) brain imaging is increasingly utilized in clinical and research settings due to its unique ability to study biological processes and subtle changes in living subjects. However, PET imaging is not without its limitations. Currently, bias introduced by partial volume effect (PVE) and poor signal-to-noise ratios of some radiotracers can hamper accurate quantification. Technological advancements like ultra-high-resolution scanners and improvements in radiochemistry are on the horizon to address these challenges. This will enable the study of smaller brain regions and may require more sophisticated methods (e.g., data-driven approaches like unsupervised clustering) for reference region selection and to improve quantification accuracy. This review delves into some of these critical aspects of PET molecular imaging and offers suggested strategies for improvement. This will be illustrated by showing examples for dopaminergic and cholinergic nerve terminal ligands.

Indexed as

partial volume effect correctionreference regionsmall regionspatial resolutionSWEDDs

Identifiers

PMID38099203
PMCPMC10720329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.