ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2023
Cardiogenic shock after 5-fluorouracil administration: a case report and literature review.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Successful VA-ECMO rescue of life-threatening cardiotoxicity following paclitaxel and cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy for laryngeal cancer: a case report.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Cardiotoxic Drug-Induced Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiogenic shock is a rare adverse event of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) administration. Because of its rare entity, little is known about epidemiologic and clinical features of 5-FU-induced cardiogenic shock, and recommendations about specific treatment are missing. Case summary: We present a case of cardiogenic shock and ventricular arrhythmia due to 5-FU-induced toxic cardiomyopathy treated with vasopressor and inotropic drugs in combination with intra-aortic balloon pump. Because of persistent haemodynamic instability, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and Impella were implanted as a bridge to recovery. Systolic function recovered completely and the patient was weaned successfully. Discussion: This case demonstrates toxic cardiomyopathy as a rare and potentially lethal cardiac adverse event of 5-FU administration. This case emphasizes the importance of mechanical support as bridging therapy to recovery of cardiac function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.