Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38098994›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2023

The potential usefulness of standardized assessments to measure participant outcomes of adaptive/therapeutic horseback riding: a survey study.

Moriah R Hanson, Kathy Alm, Beth Fields, Robin Gabriels, Arlene A Schmid, Lorann Stallones, B Caitlin Peters

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Moriah R HansonDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Kathy AlmProfessional Association of Therapeutic Horsemanship International, Denver, CO, United States.
Beth FieldsDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Robin GabrielsAnschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.
Arlene A SchmidDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Lorann StallonesDepartment of Psychology, One Health Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
B Caitlin PetersDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Colorado State University · USProfessional Association of Therapeutic Horsemanship International · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

NIH Prior Approval Process ProfessionalUL1TR002535 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2018 to 2022
$51.1M
Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CCTSI)UM1TR004399 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI JANINE A HIGGINS, RONALD J. SOKOL · 2023 to 2026
$30.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002535NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptive or therapeutic riding (A/TR) is a recreational activity which provides mounted and ground-based horsemanship opportunities adapted to the abilities of the participants. A/TR provides physical and psychological benefits to participants with diverse disabilities, including physical, developmental, cognitive, and age-related disabilities, promoting higher quality of life. A/TR professionals may be limited in their capacity to implement outcome assessments and report the benefits of their community-based A/TR services to a broad audience. The purpose of this study was to identify whether and how A/TR professionals currently measure participant outcomes; benefits and barriers to implementing standardized assessments in A/TR; and characteristics which would make assessments useful in the community-based A/TR environment. To address this purpose, we conducted a survey among A/TR professionals. We found that while A/TR professionals measure outcomes among their participants, they typically do not use standardized assessments. Survey respondents believed benefits of implementing standardized assessments included bolstering the A/TR profession, acquiring funding, and communicating about A/TR services to a broad audience. Respondents also identified several barriers to implementing standardized assessments including time, systemic, and expertise constraints. Respondents reported that useful standardized assessments would be relevant to all age groups and populations who receive A/TR services. Finally, respondents shared that for standardized assessments to be useful, they would need to be low-cost, require less than 10-20 min, and available in either paper or computer format. This study revealed that standardized assessments may be a strong support to the A/TR profession; however, assessments must meet the unique needs of A/TR professionals.

Indexed as

adaptive recreationadaptive ridingequine-assisted servicesstandardized assessmenttherapeutic riding

Identifiers

PMID38098994
PMCPMC10719839
OpenAlexW4389204082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.