ArticleHealth science reports2023
Attitudes and perceptions about COVID-19 vaccination in the population with chronic HIV infection: A systematic review.
Article in Health science reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among people living with HIV in the German HIV-1 Seroconverter Cohort, 2020-2022.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Attitudes and perceptions about COVID-19 vaccination in the population with chronic HIV infection: A systematic review.Health science reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-infected population has been increasing during the last 3 years worldwide. Moreover, simultaneously, COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials were launched. By the end of 2020, the Food and Drug Administration had authorized the emergency use of two messenger RNA vaccines against COVID-19. These fast-track vaccine approvals have produced controversy about their safety and efficacy. The purpose of this research was to discover attitudes and perceptions regarding vaccination against COVID-19 disease among vulnerable groups such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. Methods: Between June 2, 2021 and March 4, 2022, we conducted a cross-sectional study through a survey of high-risk patients with severe COVID-19, such as HIV-infected patients in the Infectious Diseases Unit (Hospital Clínico Universitario San Juan, Alicante). For the data collection strategy, a nonprobabilistic snowball sampling was adopted. A structured, anonymous, self-administered questionnaire was developed in which questions and statements were designed to evaluate their attitudes and perceptions about COVID-19 vaccination. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed for the obtained data. Results: Forty-eight participants were recruited with a mean age of 51.5 ± 11.9 years. Thirty-nine of them (81.3%) were male. The acceptance rate of COVID-19 vaccination was extremely high (95.7%). Bivariate analysis showed older patients significantly received a higher proportion of vaccine doses at the time of the survey ( Conclusion: An extremely high degree of acceptance for COVID-19 vaccination was reported. Older patients were more aware of the vaccine safety controversy. Medical staff is the most trustworthy source of information, far above all other sources. Social networks and opinion leaders have not been shown to significantly influence our population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.