Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38098955›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023

A SWOT Analysis of Hot Topics in Plastic Surgery Resident Education: Consensus From the ACAPS 10th Annual Winter Meeting.

Meera Reghunathan, Justin M Camacho, Jessica Blum, Gabriela Sendek, Thanh T Luong, Shirley Chen, Perry Bradford, Jason Llaneras, Paris D Butler, Amanda A Gosman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meera ReghunathanFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Ca.
Justin M CamachoDrexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa.
Jessica BlumDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.
Gabriela SendekFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Ca.
Thanh T LuongFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Ca.
Shirley ChenVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn.
Perry BradfordDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Virginia Health, Charlottesville, Va.
Jason LlanerasFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Ca.
Paris D ButlerDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.
Amanda A GosmanFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Ca.
Drexel University · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: With the aim of facilitating a critical self-reflection on how to align plastic surgery education with making excellent plastic surgeons, a rotating small-group session followed by live interactive audience polling was used to perform a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis at the 10th Annual American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons Winter Meeting. Methods: The final day of the conference included a 3-hour session of rotating small groups followed by live interactive audience polls discussing the following six relevant educational topics: the Plastic Surgery Common Application and resident selection, aesthetic surgery education, leadership development and business education, embedded fellowships and focused training, mentorship, and faculty retention. Results: A total of 60 individuals participated in the activity. A SWOT analysis was successfully performed for each educational topic, and a minimum of four opportunities were identified per topic to help guide future endeavors. Examples of opportunities include releasing recommendations for the implementation of holistic review; developing formal guidelines for aesthetic surgery education in residency via collaboration between ACAPS, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and The Aesthetic Society; creating extended focused elective rotations; integrating business education into formal curricula for all training levels; enforcing transparency regarding position expectations and offerings including salary, call schedule, and current challenges; and more. Conclusion: The results of this study will help guide future initiatives by the ACAPS to improve resident education and academic retention.

Identifiers

PMID38098955
PMCPMC10721128
OpenAlexW4389744248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.