Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38098931›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

How Easy Is It to Read Websites About Schizophrenia?

Kerem Laçiner, Yiğit Şenol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kerem LaçinerPsychiatry, Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TUR.
Yiğit ŞenolPublic Health, Afyonkarahisar Provincial Health Directorate, Afyonkarahisar, TUR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlike legibility, which is determined according to the formal characteristics of a text, such as typeface and page shape, 'readability' defines whether the text is easy to follow and understand by the reader. In addition, readability refers to the level of education necessary for comprehending a given text. The readability of a text can be objectively measured using mathematical formulas based on the relationships between the number of syllables, words and sentences it contains. In order for schizophrenia patients and their relatives to understand their current situation and what kind of process awaits them and to adapt to treatment, the informative texts on websites should be easy to read. Our study aimed to examine the texts about schizophrenia on websites in terms of Turkish readability levels. For the study, 'schizophrenia' was typed into the Google search engine, and the first 50 eligible websites were included. Web pages were analysed in three groups: hospitals, websites created by physicians specializing in psychiatry and other websites. In our study, formulas developed by Ateşman and Bezirci-Yılmaz were used to evaluate readability levels. Statistical analyses used analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare normally distributed groups of three. There was no statistically significant difference between the readability of the three groups (p>0.05). Our research discovered that the initial 50 websites inspected concerning schizophrenia contained texts that were challenging to read, requiring a minimum of 12 years of education. The readability level of schizophrenia-related websites was observed to be much higher than the average education level in Turkey. This situation may pose difficulties for individuals with schizophrenia and their relatives to get information about schizophrenia online. In addition, if the general population has more accurate information about schizophrenia and can understand it correctly, it may reduce the wrong attitudes and stigmatization towards individuals with schizophrenia.

Indexed as

internetpublic health informaticsreadabilityschizophreniaweb search

Identifiers

PMID38098931
PMCPMC10720762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.