ArticleComputational statistics & data analysis2024
Hierarchical False Discovery Rate Control for High-dimensional Survival Analysis with Interactions.
Article in Computational statistics & data analysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mutual-assistance learning for trustworthy biomarker discovery and disease prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- High-Dimensional Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2025Article
- Is Seeing Believing? A Practitioner's Perspective on High-Dimensional Statistical Inference in Cancer Genomics Studies.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the development of data collection techniques, analysis with a survival response and high-dimensional covariates has become routine. Here we consider an interaction model, which includes a set of low-dimensional covariates, a set of high-dimensional covariates, and their interactions. This model has been motivated by gene-environment (G-E) interaction analysis, where the E variables have a low dimension, and the G variables have a high dimension. For such a model, there has been extensive research on estimation and variable selection. Comparatively, inference studies with a valid false discovery rate (FDR) control have been very limited. The existing high-dimensional inference tools cannot be directly applied to interaction models, as interactions and main effects are not "equal". In this article, for high-dimensional survival analysis with interactions, we model survival using the Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) model and adopt a "weighted least squares + debiased Lasso" approach for estimation and selection. A hierarchical FDR control approach is developed for inference and respect of the "main effects, interactions" hierarchy. The asymptotic distribution properties of the debiased Lasso estimators are rigorously established. Simulation demonstrates the satisfactory performance of the proposed approach, and the analysis of a breast cancer dataset further establishes its practical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.