Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38098839›Full record

ArticleJournal of machine learning research : JMLR2022

Estimation and inference on high-dimensional individualized treatment rule in observational data using split-and-pooled de-correlated score.

Muxuan Liang, Young-Geun Choi, Yang Ning, Maureen A Smith, Ying-Qi Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of machine learning research : JMLR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muxuan LiangDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA.
Young-Geun ChoiDepartment of Statistics, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul 04310, Korea.
Yang NingDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, Newyork 14853, USA.
Maureen A SmithDepartments of Population Health and Family Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.
Ying-Qi ZhaoPublic Health Sciences Divisions, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA.

Funding

Statistical methods for healthcare in complex patients with diabetesR01DK108073 · NIDDK · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ZHAO, YINGQI · 2015 to 2019
$1.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK108073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing adoption of electronic health records, there is an increasing interest in developing individualized treatment rules, which recommend treatments according to patients' characteristics, from large observational data. However, there is a lack of valid inference procedures for such rules developed from this type of data in the presence of high-dimensional covariates. In this work, we develop a penalized doubly robust method to estimate the optimal individualized treatment rule from high-dimensional data. We propose a split-and-pooled de-correlated score to construct hypothesis tests and confidence intervals. Our proposal adopts the data splitting to conquer the slow convergence rate of nuisance parameter estimations, such as non-parametric methods for outcome regression or propensity models. We establish the limiting distributions of the split-and-pooled de-correlated score test and the corresponding one-step estimator in high-dimensional setting. Simulation and real data analysis are conducted to demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method.

Indexed as

double-robustnesshigh-dimensional inferenceIndividualized treatment ruleprecision medicinesemiparametric inference

Identifiers

PMID38098839
PMCPMC10720606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.