Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38098821›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

University indigenous students' perspectives on climate change and survival of indigenous peoples in Brazil: a concept mapping study.

Antonio Jose Grande, Ieda M A V Dias, Paulo T C Jardim, Alessandra Aparecida Vieira Machado, Jacks Soratto, Maria Inês da Rosa, Leonardo Roever, Luciane Bisognin Ceretta, Xanthi Zourntos, Seeromanie Harding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Antonio Jose GrandeMedicine School, State University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Ieda M A V DiasDepartment of Public Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Paulo T C JardimMedicine School, State University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Alessandra Aparecida Vieira MachadoMedicine School, State University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Jacks SorattoPublic Health Department, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciuma, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Maria Inês da RosaPublic Health Department, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciuma, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Leonardo RoeverGilbert and Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Luciane Bisognin CerettaPublic Health Department, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciuma, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Xanthi ZourntosDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Seeromanie HardingDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N015959/1Medical Research Council MR/R022739/1Medical Research Council MR/S003444/1Medical Research Council MR/S009035/1Medical Research Council MR/Y009983/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to identify what indigenous university students in Brazil perceived to be important and feasible actions to protect the survival of indigenous peoples from climate change-related impacts. Methods: Concept mapping, which is a participatory mixed methodology, was conducted virtually with 20 indigenous students at two universities in Brazil. A focus prompt was developed from consultations with indigenous stakeholders and read " Results: Students agreed on 8 clusters that reflect the factors that influence the survival of indigenous peoples-preservation of lands 0.16 (SD 0.13), protection of demarcated lands 0.31 (SD 0.10), indigenous health and wellbeing 0.35 (SD 0.14), ancestral customs 0.46 (SD 0.04), global and national actions 0.61 (SD 0.13), indigenous rights 0.64 (SD 0.23), collective living 0.71 (SD 0.21), and respect 0.75 (SD 0.14). Discussion: The most actionable priorities are related to the respect for their lands and customs, educational initiatives in schools about the importance of indigenous peoples to society, guarantees for basic health rights, and culturally appropriate provision of care, with specific mention of mental healthcare. The findings aligned closely with the concept of indigenous self-determination, which is rooted in autonomy and respect for cultural diversity, and the right to make decisions that impact their lives, land, and resources.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeHealth Services AccessibilityBrazilHuman RightsHumansIndigenous PeoplesStudentsUniversitiesclimate changecommunity based participatory researchconcept mappinghealthindigenousland losssurvival

Identifiers

PMID38098821
PMCPMC10720712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.