ArticleTrauma case reports2023
Outcomes of open pelvic fractures: A case series.
Article in Trauma case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Albeit rare, open pelvic fractures are life threatening injuries associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Due to their rarity, there is paucity of data and literature on best management practices. An open pelvic fracture is one where there is a connection between the fracture site and either the skin, rectum, vagina, or genitourinary system. They commonly affect young individuals involved in high energy injuries. During resuscitation, prompt recognition and control of sepsis and stabilization of unstable fractures should precede definitive management. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective study of prospectively collected data between 2012 and 2022 for patients managed in two teaching hospitals in Kenya. All patients were followed up for at least 6 months. The Faringer classification was used to classify the soft tissue wounds and the Young and Burgess classification was used to classify the pelvic fractures. We investigated their functional outcomes using their ability to ambulate independently and the Merle d' Aubigne-Postel score. Results: Eight patients with an average age of 31 years were included. All were referrals. Three (37.5 %) developed sepsis but resolved. Four (50 %) needed a diverting stoma, which included 2 of the 3 patients who had developed sepsis. 5(62.5 %) needed an external fixator as part of definitive management. There were no mortalities. All achieved full independent ambulation; and all our patients achieved an average Merle d' Aubigne-Postel score of 17. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that early sepsis control, appropriate fracture fixation and a multidisciplinary approach can yield satisfactory functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.