Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38098789›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2023

Ontologies for increasing the FAIRness of plant research data.

Kathryn Dumschott, Hannah Dörpholz, Marie-Angélique Laporte, Dominik Brilhaus, Andrea Schrader, Björn Usadel, Steffen Neumann, Elizabeth Arnaud, Angela Kranz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Order from entropy: big data from FAIR data cohorts in the digital age of plant breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kathryn DumschottInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences (IBG-4: Bioinformatics) & Bioeconomy Science Center (BioSC), CEPLAS, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Hannah DörpholzInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences (IBG-4: Bioinformatics) & Bioeconomy Science Center (BioSC), CEPLAS, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Marie-Angélique LaporteDigital Solutions Team, Digital Inclusion Lever, Bioversity International, Montpellier Office, Montpellier, France.
Dominik BrilhausData Science and Management & Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences (CEPLAS), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Andrea SchraderData Science and Management & Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences (CEPLAS), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Björn UsadelInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences (IBG-4: Bioinformatics) & Bioeconomy Science Center (BioSC), CEPLAS, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Steffen NeumannProgram Center MetaCom, Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Halle, Germany.
Elizabeth ArnaudDigital Solutions Team, Digital Inclusion Lever, Bioversity International, Montpellier Office, Montpellier, France.
Angela KranzInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences (IBG-4: Bioinformatics) & Bioeconomy Science Center (BioSC), CEPLAS, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of improving the FAIRness (findability, accessibility, interoperability, reusability) of research data is undeniable, especially in the face of large, complex datasets currently being produced by omics technologies. Facilitating the integration of a dataset with other types of data increases the likelihood of reuse, and the potential of answering novel research questions. Ontologies are a useful tool for semantically tagging datasets as adding relevant metadata increases the understanding of how data was produced and increases its interoperability. Ontologies provide concepts for a particular domain as well as the relationships between concepts. By tagging data with ontology terms, data becomes both human- and machine- interpretable, allowing for increased reuse and interoperability. However, the task of identifying ontologies relevant to a particular research domain or technology is challenging, especially within the diverse realm of fundamental plant research. In this review, we outline the ontologies most relevant to the fundamental plant sciences and how they can be used to annotate data related to plant-specific experiments within metadata frameworks, such as Investigation-Study-Assay (ISA). We also outline repositories and platforms most useful for identifying applicable ontologies or finding ontology terms.

Indexed as

data managementDataPLANTFAIRISAmetadataOBO foundryontologies

Identifiers

PMID38098789
PMCPMC10720748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.