Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38098783›Full record

ArticleBiodiversity data journal2023

Creating a multi-linked dynamic dataset: a case study of plant genera named for women.

Sabine von Mering, Lauren Maria Gardiner, Sandra Knapp, Heather Lindon, Siobhan Leachman, Carmen Ulloa Ulloa, Sarah Vincent, Maria S Vorontsova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biodiversity data journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sabine von MeringMuseum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin, Germany Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science Berlin Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2982-7792
Lauren Maria GardinerCambridge University Herbarium, Cambridge, United Kingdom Cambridge University Herbarium Cambridge United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8843-0317
Sandra KnappNatural History Museum, London, United Kingdom Natural History Museum London United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7698-3945
Heather LindonRoyal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom Royal Botanic Gardens Kew Richmond United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0414-7398
Siobhan LeachmanIndependent researcher, Wellington, New Zealand Independent researcher Wellington New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5398-7721
Carmen Ulloa UlloaMissouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, United States of America Missouri Botanical Garden St. Louis United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2453-8131
Sarah VincentNatural History Museum, London, United Kingdom Natural History Museum London United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4012-0571
Maria S VorontsovaRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, United Kingdom Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew London United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0899-1120

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A discussion on social media led to the formation of a multidisciplinary group working on this project to highlight women's contributions to science. The role of marginalised groups in science has been a topic of much discussion, but data on these contributions are largely lacking. Our motivation for the development of this dataset was not only to highlight names of plant genera that honour women, but to enrich this information with data that would allow the names, roles and lives of these women to be shared more widely with others, both researchers and data sources like Wikidata. Amplification of the contributions of women to botany through multiple means will enable the community to better recognise and celebrate the role of this particular marginalised group in the history and development of science. New information: The innovative approach of our study resulted in a dataset that is dynamic, expansive and widely shared. We have published a static dataset with this paper and have also created a dynamic dataset by linking flowering plant genera and the women in whose honour those genera were named in Wikidata. This concurrent addition of the data to Wikidata, a linked open data repository, enabled it to be enriched, queried and proactively shared during the whole process of dataset creation and into the future. This innovative workflow allowed wide, open participation throughout the research process. The methodology and workflows applied can be used to create future datasets celebrating and amplifying the contributions of marginalised groups in science.

Indexed as

Biodiversity Heritage Library (BHL)botanical nameseponymseponymyetymologygender studiesInternational Plant Name Index (IPNI)Linked Open Data (LOD)namingnomenclatureOpen ScienceTropicosWikidatawomen botanists

Identifiers

PMID38098783
PMCPMC10719934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.