Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38098631›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Validity of an online, self-administered Timeline Followback for alcohol use with adolescents.

Natascha Hareskov Jensen, Lotte Vallentin-Holbech, Genevieve F Dash, Sarah W Feldstein Ewing, Kristine Rømer Thomsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial of Motivational Interviewing for Adolescent Drinking in Denmark.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natascha Hareskov JensenCenter for Alcohol and Drug Research, Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lotte Vallentin-HolbechCenter for Alcohol and Drug Research, Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Genevieve F DashDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Sarah W Feldstein EwingCenter for Alcohol and Drug Research, Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kristine Rømer ThomsenCenter for Alcohol and Drug Research, Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The Timeline Followback (TLFB) is a widely used and well-validated interview-based tool for assessing patterns of recent health risk behavior. There is some evidence of the validity of the TLFB as a self-administered online tool for assessing alcohol use, but further research is needed to establish its validity in younger populations and populations outside the United States. Further, it is unknown how self-administered online TLFB formats compare to more timesaving and commonly used single-item alcohol questions. The primary aim of the current study was to validate a new online, self-administered TLFB for alcohol use against the TLFB interview in a sample of European (Danish) adolescents aged 16-18 years ( Methods: Participants completed a TLFB telephone interview, a self-administered online version of the TLFB, and single-item alcohol questions. Assessments were administered using a within-subject, counter-balanced design. Estimates of number of drinking days, binge-drinking days, maximum drinks consumed on one occasion, total drinks, and drinks per drinking day were compared across metrics. Results: All correlations between the drinking outcomes assessed via the TLFB interview and the TLFB online were positive, and statistically significant ( Conclusion: Overall, the results support the validity of the online, self-administered TLFB in a sample of European (Danish) adolescents.

Indexed as

adolescentsalcohol useassessmentbinge-drinkingmeasurement validationTimeline Followback

Identifiers

PMID38098631
PMCPMC10720705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.