ArticleESC heart failure2024
Treatment patterns and trajectories in patients after acute heart failure hospitalization.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- In-hospital course of patients with heart failure with improved ejection fraction in the DELIVER trial.European journal of heart failure · 2024Trial
- In-Hospital Improved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Prognosis in Acute Heart Failure.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Prognostic Implications of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Improvement in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2026Article
- Reducing the Burden of Heart Failure in Japan With Dapagliflozin - A Cost Offset Model (IMPLICATION HF).Circulation reports · 2025Article
- Significance and perspective of establishing a female animal model for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Article
- Treatment patterns and trajectories in patients after acute heart failure hospitalization.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThe trajectories of systolic function after admission for acute heart failure (HF) and their effect on clinical outcomes have not been fully elucidated. We aimed to assess changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between the index and 1 year after discharge and to examine their prognostic implications. METHODS AND
resultsWe extracted data from a prospective multicentre registry of patients hospitalized for acute HF and identified 1636 patients with LVEF data at admission and 1 year after discharge. We categorized them into five groups based on LVEF changes: HF with unchanged-preserved EF [HFunc-pEF (EF ≥ 50%); N = 527, 32.2%], unchanged-mildly reduced EF [HFunc-mrEF (EF 41-49%); N = 86, 5.3%], unchanged-reduced EF [HFunc-rEF (EF ≤ 40%); N = 377, 23.0%], worsened EF (HFworEF; N = 83, 5.1%), and improved EF (HFimpEF; N = 563, 34.4%). We then evaluated the subsequent composite outcome of cardiovascular death and HF readmission. During 1 year after discharge, 53% of patients with HF with reduced EF and 67% of those with HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF) transitioned to other categories, whereas 92% of those with HF with preserved EF (HFpEF) remained within the same category. Patients with HFimpEF were more likely to be younger and had relatively preserved renal function, whereas those with HFworEF were the oldest and had more comorbidities among the five groups. After multivariable adjustment, patients with HFimpEF and HFunc-pEF had a lower risk for composite outcomes when referenced to patients with HFunc-rEF [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), P-value: 0.28 (0.16-0.49), P < 0.001, and 0.40 (0.25-0.63), P < 0.001, respectively]. Conversely, patients with HFunc-mrEF and HFworEF had a comparable risk [0.44 (0.18-1.07), P = 0.07, and 0.63 (0.29-1.39), P = 0.26, respectively].
conclusionsA substantial number of patients with HF experienced transitions to other categories after discharge. Notably, patients with decreased EF experienced a worse prognosis, even with slight decreases (e.g. HFpEF transitioning to HFmrEF). These findings emphasize the significance of longitudinal assessments of systolic function to better manage patients following acute decompensation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.