Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38098121›Full record

ArticleHead & face medicine2023

Orthodontic treatment and biological limits: a retrospective clinical trial.

Niki Nikoleta Tabancis, Karl-Friedrich Krey, Franka Stahl, Valeria Behnke, Anja Ratzmann

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Head & face medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Niki Nikoleta TabancisDepartment of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Orthopaedics, University Medicine of Greifswald, Walther-Rathenau-Straße 42a, 17489, Greifswald, Germany. nikitabancis1@web.de.
Karl-Friedrich KreyDepartment of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Orthopaedics, University Medicine of Greifswald, Walther-Rathenau-Straße 42a, 17489, Greifswald, Germany.
Franka StahlDepartment of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Orthopaedics, University Medicine of Rostock, Strempelstraße 13, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Valeria BehnkeDepartment of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Orthopaedics, University Medicine of Rostock, Strempelstraße 13, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Anja RatzmannDepartment of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Orthopaedics, University Medicine of Greifswald, Walther-Rathenau-Straße 42a, 17489, Greifswald, Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe fundamental part of every successful orthodontic treatment is the detailed treatment planning including a precise determination of the virtual treatment objective (VTO) while considering the biological and anatomical limits. The aim of this study is to investigate and to compare the feasibility of the established reference values before and after orthodontic treatment and to determine the usefulness of this parameters as guidance for the sagittal anterior, sagittal posterior and transverse biological boundaries. MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty-two patients aged 9 to 18 years (12 male and 20 female) with all permanent teeth present were randomly selected for orthodontic treatment with fixed multibracket appliance regardless of the potential malocclusion. The parameters 6-PTV, 1-NB [mm] and the WALA ridge were set for the identification of the transverse, sagittal anterior and sagittal posterior tooth position. The measurements were carried out at the beginning (T0) and at the end (T1) of the orthodontic treatment. They were set in relation with their individual threshold values (G). After the results of the measurements were conducted using the software OnyxCeph3TM (version 3.2.185 (505), Image Instruments GmbH, Chemnitz, DE), they were statistically calculated in the software RStudio (2022.12.0 Build 353 © 2009-2022 Posit Software PBC).

resultsAmong the 32 patients, the mean pre- and post-treatment changes measured through the three parameters in relation to the individual reference values were statistically significant (p < 0.01). The mean values for 6-PTV, 1-NB and the WALA ridge amounted 15.37 mm, 2.56 mm and 4.23 mm at the beginning of the treatment, while after the treatment the measured values amounted 20.31 mm, 2.4 mm and 5.55 mm. These measurements combined with the statistical analysis of the changes of WALA ridge (T0, T1) confirmed that the teeth have been successfully uprighted and aligned. Furthermore, the maxillary first molars have been moved slightly mesially, as proven by the changes in 6-PTV, without certainty as to whether bodily movement or mesial tipping took place. Additionally, the lower incisors have been protruded, slightly exceeding the individual threshold values.

conclusionThe parameters investigated provide a suitable assessment tool for recording the limits of the sagittal posterior, the sagittal anterior and the transverse dimension.

Indexed as

MalocclusionCephalometryFemaleHumansIncisorMaleMolarOrthodontic Appliance DesignRetrospective StudiesTooth Movement Techniques1-NB [mm]6-PTVBiological limitsTreatment outcomeWALA ridge

Identifiers

PMID38098121
PMCPMC10720066
OpenAlexW4389766954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.