Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38098105›Full record

ArticleActa veterinaria Scandinavica2023

Application accuracy of a frameless optical neuronavigation system as a guide for craniotomies in dogs.

Sarah Gutmann, Miriam Heiderhoff, Robert Möbius, Tanja Siegel, Thomas Flegel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah GutmannDepartment for Small Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Leipzig University, An den Tierkliniken 23, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. Sarah.gutmann@kleintierklinik.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8909-8205
Miriam HeiderhoffDepartment for Small Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Leipzig University, An den Tierkliniken 23, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Robert MöbiusDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Clinic of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Tanja SiegelDepartment for Small Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Leipzig University, An den Tierkliniken 23, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Thomas FlegelDepartment for Small Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Leipzig University, An den Tierkliniken 23, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig University · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptical neuronavigation systems using infrared light to create a virtual reality image of the brain allow the surgeon to track instruments in real time. Due to the high vulnerability of the brain, neurosurgical interventions must be performed with a high precision. The aim of the experimental cadaveric study was to determine the application accuracy of a frameless optical neuronavigation system as guide for craniotomies by determining the target point deviation of predefined target points at the skull surface in the area of access to the cerebrum, cerebellum and the pituitary fossa. On each of the five canine cadaver heads ten target points were marked in a preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan. These target points were found on the cadaver skulls using the optical neuronavigation system. Then a small drill hole (1.5 mm) was drilled at these points. Subsequently, another CT scan was made. Both CT data sets were fused into the neuronavigation software, and the actual target point coordinates were identified. The target point deviation was determined as the difference between the planned and drilled target point coordinates. The calculated deviation was compared between two observers.

resultsThe analysis of the target point accuracies of all dogs in both observers taken together showed a median target point deviation of 1.57 mm (range: 0.42 to 5.14 mm). No significant differences were found between the observers or the different areas of target regions.

conclusionThe application accuracy of the described system is similar to the accuracy of other optical neuronavigation systems previously described in veterinary medicine, in which mean values of 1.79 to 4.3 mm and median target point deviations of 0.79 to 3.53 mm were determined.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesNeuronavigationAnimalsCadaverCraniotomyDogsHumansNeurosurgical ProceduresStereotaxic TechniquesBrain surgeryCanine medicineFrameless neuronavigationNeuronavigation deviceNeurosurgery

Identifiers

PMID38098105
PMCPMC10722823
OpenAlexW4389733863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.