Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38098099›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical case reports2023

Splenogonadal fusion: a case report.

Ahmed Oshiba, Dina Abdallah, Marwa Abdelaziz, Amir Ibrahim, Mostafa Kotb, Samar Eshiba, Maryam Rizvi

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmed OshibaFaculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, 21311, Egypt.
Dina AbdallahFaculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, 21311, Egypt.
Marwa AbdelazizFaculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, 21311, Egypt.
Amir IbrahimFaculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, 21311, Egypt.
Mostafa KotbFaculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, 21311, Egypt. mostafa.rashad@alexmed.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2558-3551
Samar EshibaFaculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, 21311, Egypt.
Maryam RizviFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's, King's and St Thomas' (GKT) School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, UK.
Alexandria University · EGKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccessory splenic tissue is a commonly encountered phenomenon in medical literature. Typically, these accessory spleens are found in close proximity to the main spleen, either in the hilum or within the surrounding ligaments. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that they can also be located in unusual sites such as the jejunum wall, mesentery, pelvis, and, exceptionally rarely, the scrotum. The first documented case of accessory splenic tissue in the scrotum was reported by Sneath in 1913 and is associated with a rare congenital anomaly called splenogonadal fusion. This report describes an infant who presented with a scrotal mass noted by his mother and after examination, investigations, and surgical exploration, it was revealed to be splenogonadal fusion. CASE DESCRIPTION: An 8-month-old Caucasian male patient presented with a mass in the left testicle and bluish discoloration of the scrotum, which had been incidentally noticed in the previous 2 months. The general physical examination was unremarkable. Other than a palpable scrotal mass that was related to the upper pole of the testis, the rest of examination was unremarkable. Imaging revealed that this mass originated from the tail of the epididymis without infiltrating the testis and tumor markers were normal. On inguinal exploration, a reddish brown 2 × 2 cm mass was found attached to the upper pole and was completely excised without causing any harm to the testis, vessels, or epididymis. Histopathological evaluation confirmed the presence of intratesticular ectopic splenic tissue.

conclusionAlthough uncommon, splenogonadal fusion can be included in the differential diagnosis of a testicular swelling. Accurate diagnosis allows for appropriate treatment planning which helps to avoid unnecessary radical orchiectomy, which can have a significant impact on the patient's reproductive and psychological wellbeing.

Indexed as

Digestive System AbnormalitiesSplenic DiseasesHumansInfantMaleOrchiectomyScrotumTestisAccessory spleenSplenogonadal fusionTesticular mass

Identifiers

PMID38098099
PMCPMC10722740
OpenAlexW4389752742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.