Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38098095›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

Exploring knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards artificial intelligence among health professions' students in Jordan.

Walid Al-Qerem, Judith Eberhardt, Anan Jarab, Abdel Qader Al Bawab, Alaa Hammad, Fawaz Alasmari, Badi'ah Alazab, Daoud Abu Husein, Jumana Alazab, Saed Al-Beool

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Walid Al-QeremDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, 11733, Amman, Jordan. waleed.qirim@zuj.edu.jo.
Judith EberhardtSchool of Social Sciences, Humanities and Law, Department of Psychology, Teesside University, TS1 3BX, Middlesbrough, UK.
Anan JarabCollege of Pharmacy, Al Ain University, 64141, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Abdel Qader Al BawabDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, 11733, Amman, Jordan.
Alaa HammadDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, 11733, Amman, Jordan.
Fawaz AlasmariDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, 12372, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Badi'ah AlazabDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, 11733, Amman, Jordan.
Daoud Abu HuseinDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, 11733, Amman, Jordan.
Jumana AlazabSchool of Medicine, The University of Jordan, 11910, Amman, Jordan.
Saed Al-BeoolSchool of Medicine, The University of Jordan, 11910, Amman, Jordan.
Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan · JOUniversity of Jordan · JOKing Saud University · SATeesside University · GBUnited Arab Emirates University · AE

Funding

King Saud University RSP2023R235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medical education and practice is a significant development. This study examined the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) of health professions' students in Jordan concerning AI, providing insights into their preparedness and perceptions.

methodsAn online questionnaire was distributed to 483 Jordanian health professions' students via social media. Demographic data, AI-related KAP, and barriers were collected. Quantile regression models analyzed associations between variables and KAP scores.

resultsModerate AI knowledge was observed among participants, with specific understanding of data requirements and barriers. Attitudes varied, combining skepticism about AI replacing human teachers with recognition of its value. While AI tools were used for specific tasks, broader integration in medical education and practice was limited. Barriers included lack of knowledge, access, time constraints, and curriculum gaps.

conclusionsThis study highlights the need to enhance medical education with AI topics and address barriers. Students need to be better prepared for AI integration, in order to enable medical education to harness AI's potential for improved patient care and training.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth OccupationsHumansJordanStudentsArtificial intelligenceEducationJordanMedicinePharmacyStudents

Identifiers

PMID38098095
PMCPMC10722664
OpenAlexW4389728663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.