Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38098064›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular ultrasound2023

Cardiac imaging in athlete's heart: current status and future prospects.

Nurmakhan Zholshybek, Zaukiya Khamitova, Bauyrzhan Toktarbay, Dinara Jumadilova, Nail Khissamutdinov, Tairkhan Dautov, Yeltay Rakhmanov, Makhabbat Bekbossynova, Abduzhappar Gaipov, Alessandro Salustri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular ultrasound, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nurmakhan ZholshybekSchool of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 01000, Kazakhstan.
Zaukiya KhamitovaSchool of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 01000, Kazakhstan.
Bauyrzhan ToktarbaySchool of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 01000, Kazakhstan.
Dinara JumadilovaSchool of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 01000, Kazakhstan.
Nail KhissamutdinovNational Research Cardiac Surgery Center, Cardiology Unit #2, Astana, 01000, Kazakhstan.
Tairkhan DautovClinical and Academic Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, CF "University Medical Center", Astana, 01000, Kazakhstan.
Yeltay RakhmanovSchool of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 01000, Kazakhstan.
Makhabbat BekbossynovaNational Research Cardiac Surgery Center, Cardiology Unit #2, Astana, 01000, Kazakhstan.
Abduzhappar GaipovSchool of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 01000, Kazakhstan.
Alessandro SalustriSchool of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 01000, Kazakhstan. alessandro.salustri@nu.edu.kz.

Funding

Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan AP14869730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical activity contributes to changes in cardiac morphology, which are known as "athlete's heart". Therefore, these modifications can be characterized using different imaging modalities such as echocardiography, including Doppler (flow Doppler and Doppler myocardial imaging) and speckle-tracking, along with cardiac magnetic resonance, and cardiac computed tomography. MAIN TEXT: Echocardiography is the most common method for assessing cardiac structure and function in athletes due to its availability, repeatability, versatility, and low cost. It allows the measurement of parameters like left ventricular wall thickness, cavity dimensions, and mass. Left ventricular myocardial strain can be measured by tissue Doppler (using the pulse wave Doppler principle) or speckle tracking echocardiography (using the two-dimensional grayscale B-mode images), which provide information on the deformation of the myocardium. Cardiac magnetic resonance provides a comprehensive evaluation of cardiac morphology and function with superior accuracy compared to echocardiography. With the addition of contrast agents, myocardial state can be characterized. Thus, it is particularly effective in differentiating an athlete's heart from pathological conditions, however, is less accessible and more expensive compared to other techniques. Coronary computed tomography is used to assess coronary artery anatomy and identify anomalies or diseases, but its use is limited due to radiation exposure and cost, making it less suitable for young athletes. A novel approach, hemodynamic forces analysis, uses feature tracking to quantify intraventricular pressure gradients responsible for blood flow. Hemodynamic forces analysis has the potential for studying blood flow within the heart and assessing cardiac function.

conclusionsIn conclusion, each diagnostic technique has its own advantages and limitations for assessing cardiac adaptations in athletes. Examining and comparing the cardiac adaptations resulting from physical activity with the structural cardiac changes identified through different diagnostic modalities is a pivotal focus in the field of sports medicine.

Indexed as

Cardiomegaly, Exercise-InducedAthletesEchocardiographyHeartHeart VentriclesHumansMyocardiumAthlete’s heartCardiac imagingHemodynamic forcesSports cardiology

Identifiers

PMID38098064
PMCPMC10720202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.