Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38098053›Full record

Observational studyHead & face medicine2023

Three-dimensional quantification of mandibular asymmetries in Caucasian adult patients with different sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns. A cone beam study using 3D segmentation and mirroring procedures.

Pilar España-Pamplona, Natalia Zamora-Martinez, Beatriz Tarazona-Álvarez, Valmy Pangrazio-Kulbersh, Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Head & face medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pilar España-PamplonaFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Valencia, C/ Gasco Oliag, 1, Valencia, 46010, Spain. pilarespam@gmail.com.
Natalia Zamora-MartinezFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Valencia, C/ Gasco Oliag, 1, Valencia, 46010, Spain.
Beatriz Tarazona-ÁlvarezFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Valencia, C/ Gasco Oliag, 1, Valencia, 46010, Spain.
Valmy Pangrazio-KulbershDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Detroit Mercy, Detroit, MI, USA.
Vanessa Paredes-GallardoFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Valencia, C/ Gasco Oliag, 1, Valencia, 46010, Spain.
Universitat de València · ESUniversity of Detroit Mercy · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAn accurate identification of mandibular asymmetries is required by modern orthodontics and orthognathic surgery to improve diagnosis and treatment planning of such deformities. Although craniofacial deformities are very frequent pathologies, some types of asymmetries can be very difficult to assess without the proper diagnostic tools. The purpose of this study was to implement the usage of three-dimensional (3D) segmentation procedures to identify asymmetries at the mandibular level in adult patients with different vertical and sagittal patterns where the asymmetries could go unnoticed at the observational level.

methodsThe study sample comprised 60 adult patients (33 women and 27 men, aged between 18 and 60 years). Subjects were divided into 3 sagittal and vertical skeletal groups. CBCT images were segmented, mirrored and voxel-based registered with reference landmarks using ITK-SNAP® and 3DSlicer® software's. 3D surface models were constructed to evaluate the degree of asymmetry at different anatomical levels.

resultsThere was a degree of asymmetry, with the left hemimandible tending to contain the right one (0.123 ± 0.270 mm (CI95% 0.036-0.222; p < 0.001). Although the subjects under study did not present significant differences between mandibular asymmetries and their sagittal or vertical skeletal pattern (p = 0.809 and p = 0.453, respectively), a statistically significant difference has been found depending on the anatomical region (p < 0.001; CI95%=1.020-1.021), being higher in the condyle, followed by the ramus and the corpus.

conclusionsAlthough mandibular asymmetries cannot be correlated with vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns in symmetric patients, knowledge about 3D segmentation procedures and color maps can provide valuable information to identify mandibular asymmetries.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyImaging, Three-DimensionalAdolescentAdultFacial AsymmetryFemaleHumansMaleMandibleMandibular CondyleMiddle AgedYoung Adult3D segmentationCBCTMandibular asymmetrySkeletal patterns

Identifiers

PMID38098053
PMCPMC10720065
OpenAlexW4389738179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.