Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38098011›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

National Institutes of Health R-series Grants portfolio of racism and healthcare, 2017-2022.

Judith Aponte, Maria Isabel Roldós

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Judith AponteHunter College School of Nursing| City University of New York - CUNY, CUNY Institute of Health Equity, New York, USA. jap@hunter.cuny.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1773-2200
Maria Isabel RoldósDepartment of Health Equity, Administration, and Technology, School of Health Sciences, Human Services and Nursing (HS2N) | Lehman College | City University of New York - CUNY, CUNY Institute for Health Equity, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2780-7018
City University of New York · USLehman College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAny form of racism in healthcare is an unacceptable barrier to receiving equitable and quality care, further contributing to health disparities among populations. For these reasons, it is critical to have a better understanding on the amount of research and scientific advances of funded projects aimed at racism in healthcare. An examination of the distribution of R-series funded research by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) on racism in healthcare during a 5-year fiscal year (FY) period (2017-2022) was conducted by the study team.

methodsThis cross-sectional study used publicly available data from the NIH RePORTER (Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools: Expenditures and Results) for research project grants awarded on racism and healthcare during the FYs of 2017 to 2022. The number of R-series NIH funded projects on racism in healthcare were examined, including the abstract and public health relevance statement, number of publications, spending category, fiscal start and end dates, total amount of funding each year, funding agency/center(s), and type of funding opportunity announcements. Descriptive statistics were performed on the data by the research team.

resultsThere were a total of 93 R-series grants funded during the FYs of 2017 to 2022. Most of the grants were R01s (77.4%); focused primarily on racism at the system-wide level (68.8%), and on patients (64.5%); the largest racial and ethnic minority group reported were African/American/Black (20.4%); and close to 40% did not report race or ethnicity. None of the grants focused in internalized racism, which is at the individual -level. From the FYs of 2017 to 2022, 0.07% of all NIH research funding was awarded to racism in healthcare.

conclusionThe findings of this study showed the need for continued funding and of the need of more research on racism in healthcare, that potentially can reduce health disparities and inequities.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchRacismCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareEthnicityHumansMinority GroupsNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)United StatesNational Institutes of HealthRacism and healthcareR-series Grants

Identifiers

PMID38098011
PMCPMC10722752
OpenAlexW4389728320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.