SynthesisBMC women's health2023
Survival rate of cervical cancer in Asian countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC women's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to standard chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for advanced or recurrent cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Associations of the gut, cervical, and vaginal microbiota with cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC women's health · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness and safety of ICIs for the treatment of advanced CC: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Burden and predictors of cervical cancer mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Infectious agents and cancer · 2026Review
- Population-based epidemiological study of cervical cancer in Khuzestan province, Iran (2014-2019).BMC public health · 2026Article
- Cervical Cancer Epidemiology: Global Incidence, Mortality, Survival, Risk Factors, and Equity in HPV Screening and Vaccination.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Epidemiology, outcomes of treatment, and survival of cervical cancer in Kazakhstan: a nationwide population-based study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- The oral microbiome in relation to systemic maternal conditions and pregnancy complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of oral microbiology · 2026Review
- Determinants of Female Cancer Screening Awareness in Alabama's Black Belt Region.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Prevalence and distribution of human papillomavirus genotypes in women living with HIV: a cross-sectional study in Iran.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Prognostic significance of systemic immune inflammation index and systemic inflammation response index for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Survival rates of cervical cancer patients in Sarawak: a single-centre referral study.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Article
- Quality of Life of Emirati Women with Cervical Cancer Using EORTC QLQ-30 and CX24: A First Look in the UAE.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Nomogram model for predicting the long-term prognosis of cervical cancer patients: a population-based study in Mato Grosso, Brazil.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- m6A-modified circSTX6 as a key regulator of cervical cancer malignancy via SPI1 and IL6/JAK2/STAT3 pathways.Oncogene · 2025Article
- A nomogram for predicting prognosis for young cervical neuroendocrine carcinoma: A SEER-based study and external validation.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Global Research Trends in Cervical Cancer Survival in the Last Two Decades: A Bibliometric Analysis.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCancer is one of the main causes of death, and cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the fourth leading cause of death from malignancy among women. Knowing the survival rate is used to evaluate the success of current treatments and care. This study was conducted to assess the survival rate of cervical cancer in Asia.
methodsThis systematic survey was conducted on four international databases, including Medline/PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, and Web of Knowledge, and includes manuscripts that were published until the end of August 2021. Selected keywords were searched for international databases including cervical neoplasms [mesh], survival analysis or survival or survival rate, Asian countries (name of countries). The Newcastle-Ottawa Qualitative Evaluation Form was used for cohort studies to evaluate the quality of the articles. The analysis process was performed to evaluate the heterogeneity of the studies using the Cochran test and I
resultsA total of 1956 articles were selected and reviewed based on their title. The results showed that 110 articles met the inclusion criteria. According to the randomized model, the 1, 3, 5, and 10-year survival rates of cervical cancer were 76.62% (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 72.91_80.34), 68.77% (95% CI, 64.32_73.21), 62.34% (95% CI, 58.10_66.59), and 61.60% (95% CI, 52.31_70.89), respectively. Additionally, based on the results of meta-regression analysis, there was an association between the year of the study and the survival rate, elucidating that the survival rate of cervical cancer has increased over the years.
conclusionsResults can provide the basic information needed for effective policy making, and development of public health programs for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cervical cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.