Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38098001›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

Computer-aided autism diagnosis using visual attention models and eye-tracking: replication and improvement proposal.

Felipe O Franco, Jessica S Oliveira, Joana Portolese, Fernando M Sumiya, Andréia F Silva, Ariane Machado-Lima, Fatima L S Nunes, Helena Brentani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Felipe O FrancoInterunit PostGraduate Program on Bioinformatics, Institute of Mathematics and Statistics (IME), University of São Paulo (USP), 05508-090, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. franco@ime.usp.br.
Jessica S OliveiraSchool of Arts, Sciences and Humanities (EACH), University of São Paulo (USP), 03828-000, São Paulo-SP, Brazil.
Joana PortoleseDepartment of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo's School of Medicine (FMUSP), 05403-903, São Paulo-SP, Brazil.
Fernando M SumiyaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo's School of Medicine (FMUSP), 05403-903, São Paulo-SP, Brazil.
Andréia F SilvaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo's School of Medicine (FMUSP), 05403-903, São Paulo-SP, Brazil.
Ariane Machado-LimaSchool of Arts, Sciences and Humanities (EACH), University of São Paulo (USP), 03828-000, São Paulo-SP, Brazil.
Fatima L S NunesSchool of Arts, Sciences and Humanities (EACH), University of São Paulo (USP), 03828-000, São Paulo-SP, Brazil.
Helena BrentaniDepartment of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo's School of Medicine (FMUSP), 05403-903, São Paulo-SP, Brazil.

Funding

Brazilian National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) 309030/2019-6National Program to Support Health Care for Persons with Disabilities (PRONAS/PCD) 25000.002484/2017-17São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) 2020/01992-0University of São Paulo - PRP USP n. 668/2018 18.5.245.86.7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) diagnosis can be aided by approaches based on eye-tracking signals. Recently, the feasibility of building Visual Attention Models (VAMs) from features extracted from visual stimuli and their use for classifying cases and controls has been demonstrated using Neural Networks and Support Vector Machines. The present work has three aims: 1) to evaluate whether the trained classifier from the previous study was generalist enough to classify new samples with a new stimulus; 2) to replicate the previously approach to train a new classifier with a new dataset; 3) to evaluate the performance of classifiers obtained by a new classification algorithm (Random Forest) using the previous and the current datasets.

methodsThe previously approach was replicated with a new stimulus and new sample, 44 from the Typical Development group and 33 from the ASD group. After the replication, Random Forest classifier was tested to substitute Neural Networks algorithm.

resultsThe test with the trained classifier reached an AUC of 0.56, suggesting that the trained classifier requires retraining of the VAMs when changing the stimulus. The replication results reached an AUC of 0.71, indicating the potential of generalization of the approach for aiding ASD diagnosis, as long as the stimulus is similar to the originally proposed. The results achieved with Random Forest were superior to those achieved with the original approach, with an average AUC of 0.95 for the previous dataset and 0.74 for the new dataset.

conclusionIn summary, the results of the replication experiment were satisfactory, which suggests the robustness of the approach and the VAM-based approaches feasibility to aid in ASD diagnosis. The proposed method change improved the classification performance. Some limitations are discussed and additional studies are encouraged to test other conditions and scenarios.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderComputersDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedEye-Tracking TechnologyHumansAutism spectrum disorderClassifierEye-trackingMachine learningReplicability

Identifiers

PMID38098001
PMCPMC10722824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.